Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE:NGI International Task Review MS109"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== NGI International Task Review MS109 == | == NGI International Task Review MS109 == | ||
=== | === NGI Assessment by Service === | ||
* | |||
Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines: | |||
* Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'') | |||
* Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'') | |||
* Assessment: please anwer the following questions: | |||
** did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?) | |||
** is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expland it? | |||
** is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed? | |||
** is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service) | |||
* Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction | |||
** 0 = not applicable | |||
** 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered | |||
** 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered | |||
** 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered | |||
** 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement. | |||
** 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice | |||
* How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose | |||
=== List of NGIs === | === List of NGIs === |
Revision as of 12:16, 28 February 2011
NGI International Task Review MS109
NGI Assessment by Service
Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines:
- Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
- Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
- Assessment: please anwer the following questions:
- did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?)
- is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expland it?
- is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
- is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
- Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
- 0 = not applicable
- 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
- 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
- 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
- 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
- 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
- How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose
List of NGIs
- Albania
- Armenia
- Belarus
- Bulgaria
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Spain
- Portugal
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Macedonia
- Moldova
- Montenegro
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- Romania
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Turkey
- United Kingdom