Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE:NGI International Task Review MS109"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(31 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | [[Category:Metrics]] | ||
== NGI International Task Review MS109 == | |||
This page contains the | This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution that will become part of the [https://documents.egi.eu/document/315 EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS109 "NGI International Task Review"] | ||
== | === NGI Assessment by Service === | ||
Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines: | |||
* Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'') | * Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'') | ||
* Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'') | * Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'') | ||
* Assessment: please anwer the following questions: | * Assessment: please anwer the following questions: | ||
** did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability? | ** for infrastructure/technical services: | ||
** is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/ | *** did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?) | ||
** is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed? | *** is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expand it? | ||
** is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service) | ** for human services: | ||
*** did you establish working communication links between NGI partners and with EGI.eu? | |||
*** how do you evaluate is the impact of the activity? | |||
** for all: | |||
*** is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed? | |||
*** is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service) | |||
* Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction | * Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction | ||
** 0 = not applicable | ** 0 = not applicable | ||
Line 48: | Line 26: | ||
** 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement. | ** 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement. | ||
** 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice | ** 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice | ||
* How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose | * How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the NGI service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service | ||
=== | === List of NGIs === | ||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Albania | Albania]] | |||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Armenia | Armenia]] | ||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Belarus | Belarus]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Bulgaria | Bulgaria]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina | Bosnia and Herzegovina]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Croatia | Croatia]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Cyprus | Cyprus]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Czech_Republic | Czech Republic]] | |||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Denmark | Denmark]] | ||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Finland | Finland]] | |||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_France | France]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Georgia | Georgia]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Germany | Germany]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Greece | Greece]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Hungary | Hungary]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Ireland | Ireland]] | ||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Israel | Israel]] | |||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Italy | Italy]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Latvia | Latvia]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Lithuania | Lithuania ]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Macedonia | Macedonia]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Moldova | Moldova]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Montenegro | Montenegro]] | ||
| | # [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Netherlands | Netherlands]] | ||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Norway | Norway]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Poland | Poland]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Portugal | Portugal]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Romania | Romania]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Russia | Russia]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Serbia | Serbia]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Slovakia | Slovakia]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Slovenia | Slovenia]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Spain | Spain]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Sweden | Sweden]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Switzerland | Switzerland]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Turkey | Turkey ]] | |||
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_United_Kingdom | United Kingdom]] |
Latest revision as of 20:50, 24 December 2014
NGI International Task Review MS109
This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution that will become part of the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS109 "NGI International Task Review"
NGI Assessment by Service
Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines:
- Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
- Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
- Assessment: please anwer the following questions:
- for infrastructure/technical services:
- did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?)
- is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?
- for human services:
- did you establish working communication links between NGI partners and with EGI.eu?
- how do you evaluate is the impact of the activity?
- for all:
- is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
- is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
- for infrastructure/technical services:
- Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
- 0 = not applicable
- 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
- 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
- 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
- 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
- 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
- How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the NGI service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service
List of NGIs
- Albania
- Armenia
- Belarus
- Bulgaria
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Macedonia
- Moldova
- Montenegro
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Turkey
- United Kingdom