Difference between revisions of "WI07 Security Vulnerability handling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(First import) |
(Update Security Dashboard URL) |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Op menubar}} {{Template:GO menubar}} {{TOC_right}} | |||
[[Category:Infrastructure_Oversight|*]] | |||
= Work instruction to follow Security Vulnerability handling RT tickets = | |||
The purpose of this page is to provide instructions to the EGI Operations team members part of the operations-vulnerability-handling SSO group on how to handle Security Vulnerability identified by [[IRTF]]. | |||
The main idea behind this handling is to make sure that sites are aware of the issue and working on it. | |||
Usually, sites that are showing good intention are not penalized even if the progress is not strictly within the procedure: [[SEC03_EGI-CSIRT_Critical_Vulnerability_Handling|SEC03]]. | |||
* | {| align="center" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" | ||
|- | |||
! Step | |||
! Action | |||
|- | |||
| 1 | |||
| [[IRTF]] is responsible for: | |||
* looking at [https://pakiti.egi.eu/ Pakiti] and [https://operations-portal.egi.eu/ROD#csi Security dashboard]. | |||
* looking for false positives | |||
* creating new [https://rt.egi.eu/ RT] tickets in the Vulnerability Handling queue with a due date of 3 days. | |||
|- | |||
| 2a | |||
| If there is no acknowledgement or answer from the site: | |||
* 1 working day before the due date, EGI Operations send another reminder via the [http://go.egi.eu/rt_vulnhand Vulnerability Handling Queue in RT] using the '''Reply''' action. | |||
<nowiki>Dear security contact for XX-XX-XXX, | |||
This is a friendly reminder that we didn't receive any update about this ticket! | |||
Thanks,</nowiki> | |||
* .5 working day before the due date, EGI Operations send a last reminder, potentially including operational contacts in addition to security contacts. In such case, in case of an answer, verify that the security contact is still valid | |||
* After the due date, suspend the site | |||
|- | |||
| 2b | |||
| If there is an acknowledgement, but no solution announced: | |||
* 1 working day before the due date, EGI Operations checks [https://pakiti.egi.eu/ Pakiti]: | |||
** If there is no change, ask for progress/for an update, insisting | |||
** If the vulnerability disappeared from [https://pakiti.egi.eu/ Pakiti], ask for a confirmation that the vulnerability was fixed and that it's not simply the affected node not being reached by the Nagios probe (which usually reach different nodes every day) | |||
|- | |||
| 3 | |||
| After the due date, if there is still no answer/solution announced, EGI Operations suspend the site | |||
|- | |||
| 4 | |||
| If a solution is said to be deployed: | |||
* If it's a mitigation: | |||
** If different from any mentioned in the advisory escalate to [[IRTF]] | |||
** If it's the same, EGI Operations wait for up to a day and check the security dashboard | |||
* If it's a simple package/kernel update, EGI Operations check [https://pakiti.egi.eu/ Pakiti]: | |||
** If there is a report for the affected node(s) without any vulnerability, thanks and close the ticket | |||
** If the last report for the affected node(s) is still from before the update, ask to run the Pakiti client by following [[EGI_CSIRT:Pakiti_client]]. | |||
*** If the vulnerability then disappear from [https://pakiti.egi.eu/ Pakiti], with or without any other message, close the ticket | |||
|} |
Revision as of 15:19, 28 April 2021
Main | EGI.eu operations services | Support | Documentation | Tools | Activities | Performance | Technology | Catch-all Services | Resource Allocation | Security |
EGI Infrastructure Operations Oversight menu: | Home • | EGI.eu Operations Team • | Regional Operators (ROD) |
Work instruction to follow Security Vulnerability handling RT tickets
The purpose of this page is to provide instructions to the EGI Operations team members part of the operations-vulnerability-handling SSO group on how to handle Security Vulnerability identified by IRTF.
The main idea behind this handling is to make sure that sites are aware of the issue and working on it. Usually, sites that are showing good intention are not penalized even if the progress is not strictly within the procedure: SEC03.
Step | Action |
---|---|
1 | IRTF is responsible for:
|
2a | If there is no acknowledgement or answer from the site:
Dear security contact for XX-XX-XXX, This is a friendly reminder that we didn't receive any update about this ticket! Thanks,
|
2b | If there is an acknowledgement, but no solution announced:
|
3 | After the due date, if there is still no answer/solution announced, EGI Operations suspend the site |
4 | If a solution is said to be deployed:
|