Difference between revisions of "VT Scientific Publications Repository Meetings/2012-07-24"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{EGI_Activity_groups_menubar}} | |||
{{Menubar_VT}} | |||
{{Template:ScientificPublicationsRepository_menubar}} | {{Template:ScientificPublicationsRepository_menubar}} | ||
{{TOC_right}} | |||
[[Category:Virtual_Teams]] | |||
== Meeting 24 July 2012 - 10-11 CEST == | == Meeting 24 July 2012 - 10-11 CEST == |
Latest revision as of 17:09, 19 June 2015
EGI Activity groups | Special Interest groups | Policy groups | Virtual teams | Distributed Competence Centres |
EGI Virtual teams: | Main • | Active Projects • | Closed Projects • | Guidelines |
VT Scientific Publications Repository: | VT Scientific Publications Repository • | Tasks • | Meetings & Actions |
Meeting 24 July 2012 - 10-11 CEST
Agenda
- Agenda bashing
- Minutes approval
- Actions review:
- discuss agenda for the EGI TF12: VT_Scientific_Publications_Repository_EGITF12
- discuss report from Genevieve on OpenAIRE: VT_Scientific_Publications_Repository_OpenAIRE
- discuss the proposed policy to enforce e-infrastructure users to communicate their scientific output to EGI: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AqgpAGKtp_HHdFJLY2dzaFIwb2pZUVJUTDE1QUhFRHc&single=true&gid=3&output=html
- AOB
Participants
- Sergio Andreozzi, EGI.eu
- Genevieve Romier, NGI-FR
- Burcu Ortakaya, NGI TR
- Wilhelm Bühler, NGI-DE
Apologize:
- Catherine Gater, EGI.eu
- Sara Coelho, EGI.eu
- Vicky Huang, APGI-ASGC
- Torsten Antoni, NGI-DE
Minutes
- Minutes Approval
- Approved
- Actions Review
- http://go.egi.eu/vt-scirep-actions
- about PRACE best practices:
- Burcu: no answer yet; DEISA/PRACE they have calls to assign resources, no clear indication of repositories for publications, in DEISA website, publications up to 2010; from PRACE no public information
- about OpenAIRE
- Genevieve: the final client of EGI is a researcher who probably does not know what is EGI; in France, it is difficult to know who is the final researcher; the people who can oblige them are those who provide money; as NGI, is difficult to oblige them
- Burcu: at first step you need to convince the researcher to put the standard text in the publication; in most cases, they forget
- Burcu: we can provide some award process
Emerging positions:
- 1. Obligations: we should put obligations in the Grid AUP for the researchers about adding acknowledgment for using EGI/NGI resources; we understand that increasing the awareness and importance of following them is not easy; this should be coupled with:
- a. a good communication plan
- b. award program (e.g., the best publication of the last 6 months is selected and one author invited to EGI Community/Technical Forum)
- c. strong presence in user interfaces (e.g., on science gateways or command-line interface tools used by researchers, EGI website, NGI website, campaign through EGI Champions, dissemination through site admin, footer in the GGUS tickets)
- 2. EGI should have its own repository:
- a. it could cover either just the metadata or also the upload of the publication
- b. it should be integrated with OpenAIRE to feed automatically EU-funded publications into it and comply with EU open access policies
- c. decision to be made
- option a: researchers are asked to feed data into their closest repository; if not available, can use the EGI one; mechanisms for harvesting from EGI should be envisioned in this case
- option b: researchers should always put their publication reference in the EGI repository; this should be made as much easy as possible, e.g. just add a URL (e.g., Handle)
- Next Meeting
- 5 Sep 10AM or 6 Sep 3PM CEST (TBC)
- AOB
- Wilhelm: suggest to put all the content from the google docs in the wiki, he can help with the formatting being a mediawiki expert (added action for Sergio)