Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "Resource Allocation Task Force brainstorming page"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Op menubar}} {{TOC_right}} The main goals are:  
{{Template:Op menubar}} {{TOC_right}}  
 
The main goals are:  


*Attract new users and allocate them some grid resources  
*Attract new users and allocate them some grid resources  
Line 52: Line 54:
= Issues for discussion  =
= Issues for discussion  =


#The role of NGI, EGI, RC
#The role of NGI, EGI, RC  
#Need for scientific request review  
#Need for scientific request review  
#
#
Line 58: Line 60:
= Ideas received  =
= Ideas received  =


#Freedom to express what is possible for NGIs (law,resources etc.). Not all of them are able to support given VO, even if they want to.
#Freedom to express what is possible for NGIs (law,resources etc.). Not all of them are able to support given VO, even if they want to.  
#The SLA should be easy enough to be filled in, which means that many service levels should be made optional, as we do now in the VO ID card.
#The SLA should be easy enough to be filled in, which means that many service levels should be made optional, as we do now in the VO ID card.  
#The resource allocation process should not only allow to address a resource request with an offer, but also vice versa a site with free resources to advertise it.
#The resource allocation process should not only allow to address a resource request with an offer, but also vice versa a site with free resources to advertise it.  
#National VOs need to talk to their NGIs, however, the same processes and interfaces used for EGI international users could be adopted for regional ones.
#National VOs need to talk to their NGIs, however, the same processes and interfaces used for EGI international users could be adopted for regional ones.  
#The internal allocation processes and liaison to individual resource contributors should be made transparent.
#The internal allocation processes and liaison to individual resource contributors should be made transparent.  
#The same processes that are being defined for resource allocation, could be generalized to request services, i.e. to allow new user communities to request services to be provided by NGIs, such as application porting.
#The same processes that are being defined for resource allocation, could be generalized to request services, i.e. to allow new user communities to request services to be provided by NGIs, such as application porting.


[[Category:Task_forces]]
[[Category:Task_forces]]

Revision as of 15:59, 18 January 2013

Main EGI.eu operations services Support Documentation Tools Activities Performance Technology Catch-all Services Resource Allocation Security



The main goals are:

  • Attract new users and allocate them some grid resources
  • Provide users with a simplified procedure to find grid resources for their needs and by means of a central unique reference point


The high level processes

Actors

Prerequisites

Models

Model 1

Pros

Cons

Use cases

Role of Actors

NGI, EGI and RP

Model 2

Pros

Cons

Use cases

Role of Actors

NGI, EGI and RP

Model 3

Pros

Cons

Use cases

Role of Actors

NGI, EGI and RP

Issues for discussion

  1. The role of NGI, EGI, RC
  2. Need for scientific request review

Ideas received

  1. Freedom to express what is possible for NGIs (law,resources etc.). Not all of them are able to support given VO, even if they want to.
  2. The SLA should be easy enough to be filled in, which means that many service levels should be made optional, as we do now in the VO ID card.
  3. The resource allocation process should not only allow to address a resource request with an offer, but also vice versa a site with free resources to advertise it.
  4. National VOs need to talk to their NGIs, however, the same processes and interfaces used for EGI international users could be adopted for regional ones.
  5. The internal allocation processes and liaison to individual resource contributors should be made transparent.
  6. The same processes that are being defined for resource allocation, could be generalized to request services, i.e. to allow new user communities to request services to be provided by NGIs, such as application porting.