Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "Operations Surveys"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(86 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page collects information about surveys relevant to the EGI Opreations Community and the EGI Technology Providers (such as EMI, IGE, etc.). Surveys are conducted to collect information about deployed software, oprational tools and generally speaking to collect feedback from Resource Infrastructure Providers and Resource Centres.
{{Template:Op menubar}} {{TOC_right}}


==Survey on Logging and Bookkeeping capabilities, service management and auditing and gLite-CLUSTER==
This page collects information about surveys relevant to the EGI Operations Community and the EGI Technology Providers (such as EMI, IGE, etc.). Surveys are conducted to collect information about deployed software, operational tools and generally speaking to collect feedback from Resource Infrastructure Providers and Resource Centres.
* Release date: 18 Jan 2011
* Deadline for submission: 10 Feb 2011


===Overview===
* '''PART 1, [http://egee.cesnet.cz/cs/JRA1/LB/ Logging and Bookkeeping Service]''': Logging and Bookkeeping (LB) it is a monitoring service which  gathers, aggregates and archives information on infrastructure behaviour from the perspective of users' tasks. The EMI project aims at extending the LB scope and its further integration with other grid services. The first  page of the survey contains a set of questions to help LB Team to better  design the new features of the LB Service, and to target the real users' needs.


* '''PART 2, Remote Grid Service Management (RGSM)'''. Management is performed through a set of notifications issued to the relevant Grid service instance. Examples of management actions are: start, stop, drain etc. The RGSM framework can be used for remote management of a service. EMI has a dedicated [https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EMI/EmiJra1T5TaskForceServiceManagement task force] to investigate the requirements for common service monitoring and management interfaces. This  survey is to collect information and requirements from the EGI operations community and sites to understand which technologies are of interest for service management.
= NGI services provisioning and usage=


* '''PART 3, Grid service auditing (GSA)''', that is a feature that allows a system administrators and users to check the status of a service in terms of load, length of internal queues, and to monitor service workload from a grid point of view over time. Service auditing is different from Nagios-based monitoring as it is not based on probes, but rather on the periodic gathering of service status information.
*Release date: '''19-06-2013'''  
*Deadline for submission:'''12-07-2013'''


* '''PART 4, gLite CLUSTER''', [https://documents.egi.eu/document/308 glite-CLUSTER] allows the configuration of information related to the batch system environment to be separated from the configuration of the job submission interface. With this service sites will be able to publish their resources information consistently and without any workaround. Even in case of multiple CEs or cluster with heterogeneous hardware configuaration. There are few questions to understand how the publishing of cluster information is a problem for site managers.
== Overview  ==


===Instructions===
The NGI operations sustainability survey provides indications of little progress in securing new funding to support national operations services to compensate the end of EC funding expected after April 2014 with the end of EGI-InSPIRE. Through EGI-InSPIRE EC currently contribute to the 33% of the operational costs of national grid infrastructures.  
The survey needs to be completed '''on-line''' on zoomerang (submission via e-mail or other form is not accepted).
Every NGI is requested to collect feedback internally and to provide them through a ''single'' submission.
NGIs that are operated by a multi-country federated Operations Centre can submit their feedback either individually or through their Operations Centre.
Note that the survey needs to be submitted at one time (it cannot be saved and re-edited at a later time).


'''GO TO [http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22BQP2JEH5Z/ SURVEY]'''
Costs of running operations can be partly reduced by sharing operational services with other NGIs and by increasing their efficiency by centrally coordinating the deployment of core services. With this survey we aim at collecting NGI expressions of interest in exploring some of these deployment scenarios in preparation to the end of EGI-InSPIRE. The results of this survey will be used to plan actions for a transition to the period after EGI-InSPIRE.  


===Resources===
== Instructions  ==
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/8/88/SA1_Survey_2011_Jan_18-v3.pdf pdf] version of the survey
 
Please participate to the survey by submitting your contribution. <big>'''[https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/NGI_services_provisioning_and_usage  Click here to take survey]'''</big>.
 
<big>'''[https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/File:Survey_Federation_of_NGI_services_and_central_coordination_v2_.pdf PDF version of the survey]'''</big>. It is a fill-in form PDF (''Acrobat Reader X'' allows to save forms) and can be used for your convenience, but submit your official answer using the online survey.
 
== Results  ==
 
= Use of configuration management tools in the EGI resource centres  =
 
*Release date:&nbsp; '''2013-01-28 '''
*Deadline for submission:'''*2013-03-01, close of business*'''
 
== Overview  ==
 
The support of the common components of yaim (glite-yaim-core, in the EMI products list) after the end of the EMI project is being discussed, and the product teams responsible of EMI/gLite components currently relying on YAIM, may decide to move to a different configuration mechanism in the future.<br> <br> Several sites are already using various software configuration management tools (e.g. puppet) to deploy their middleware services, and if in the future it will not be possible to set up grid services with a homogenous configuration file (e.g. the site-info.def used by yaim) the deployment and configuration of grid resource centres may rely more heavily on these configuration tools.
 
'''Survey purposes:''' The results of this survey will be used by the EGI Operations Management Board to identify suitable replacements for yaim,for those EGI/gLite products for which yaim support will be abandoned (if this will be the case), and to encourage NGIs and sites to share their current experiences with these tools, and best practices.
 
== Instructions  ==
 
Please participate to the survey by submitting your contribution. <big>'''[https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9TH5T9L Click here to take survey]'''</big>. '''(please, submit one response per site)'''
 
<big>'''[https://documents.egi.eu/document/1557 PDF version of the survey]'''</big>. It is a fill-in form PDF (''Acrobat Reader X'' allows to save forms) and can be used for your convenience, but submit your official answer using the online survey.
 
== Results  ==
* [https://indico.egi.eu/indico/getFile.py/access?contribId=6&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=1234 slides] OMB, March 2013
 
 
 
 
= [[EGI Operations Surveys (CLOSED)|CLOSED Surveys]]  =
 
[[Category:Operations_Management_Board]]

Latest revision as of 12:29, 20 June 2013

Main EGI.eu operations services Support Documentation Tools Activities Performance Technology Catch-all Services Resource Allocation Security



This page collects information about surveys relevant to the EGI Operations Community and the EGI Technology Providers (such as EMI, IGE, etc.). Surveys are conducted to collect information about deployed software, operational tools and generally speaking to collect feedback from Resource Infrastructure Providers and Resource Centres.


NGI services provisioning and usage

  • Release date: 19-06-2013
  • Deadline for submission:12-07-2013

Overview

The NGI operations sustainability survey provides indications of little progress in securing new funding to support national operations services to compensate the end of EC funding expected after April 2014 with the end of EGI-InSPIRE. Through EGI-InSPIRE EC currently contribute to the 33% of the operational costs of national grid infrastructures.

Costs of running operations can be partly reduced by sharing operational services with other NGIs and by increasing their efficiency by centrally coordinating the deployment of core services. With this survey we aim at collecting NGI expressions of interest in exploring some of these deployment scenarios in preparation to the end of EGI-InSPIRE. The results of this survey will be used to plan actions for a transition to the period after EGI-InSPIRE.

Instructions

Please participate to the survey by submitting your contribution. Click here to take survey.

PDF version of the survey. It is a fill-in form PDF (Acrobat Reader X allows to save forms) and can be used for your convenience, but submit your official answer using the online survey.

Results

Use of configuration management tools in the EGI resource centres

  • Release date:  2013-01-28
  • Deadline for submission:*2013-03-01, close of business*

Overview

The support of the common components of yaim (glite-yaim-core, in the EMI products list) after the end of the EMI project is being discussed, and the product teams responsible of EMI/gLite components currently relying on YAIM, may decide to move to a different configuration mechanism in the future.

Several sites are already using various software configuration management tools (e.g. puppet) to deploy their middleware services, and if in the future it will not be possible to set up grid services with a homogenous configuration file (e.g. the site-info.def used by yaim) the deployment and configuration of grid resource centres may rely more heavily on these configuration tools.

Survey purposes: The results of this survey will be used by the EGI Operations Management Board to identify suitable replacements for yaim,for those EGI/gLite products for which yaim support will be abandoned (if this will be the case), and to encourage NGIs and sites to share their current experiences with these tools, and best practices.

Instructions

Please participate to the survey by submitting your contribution. Click here to take survey. (please, submit one response per site)

PDF version of the survey. It is a fill-in form PDF (Acrobat Reader X allows to save forms) and can be used for your convenience, but submit your official answer using the online survey.

Results



CLOSED Surveys