Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "Operations/Resource Allocation"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:Op menubar}} __TOC__  
{{Template:Op menubar}}  
[[Category:Operations Management Board]]
__TOC__  


'''DEADLINE for reply: 07 September 2012'''  
'''DEADLINE for reply: 07 September 2012'''  
Line 51: Line 53:
|-
|-
| NGI_AEGIS  
| NGI_AEGIS  
| VOs supported by the AEGIS sites: national VO (aegis), High Energy Physics VOs (atlas, cms), regional and projects specific VOs (see, seegrid, sgdemo, ops.vo.egee-see.org, meteo.see-grid-sci.eu, seismo.see-grid-sci.eu, env.see-grid-sci.eu, desktopgrid.vo.edges-grid.eu, vo.aginfra.eu). 30% of the resources is allocated to the national VO, 50% to regional and projects specific VOs and 20% to High Energy Physics VOs.
| VOs supported by the AEGIS sites: national VO (aegis), High Energy Physics VOs (atlas, cms), regional and projects specific VOs (see, seegrid, sgdemo, ops.vo.egee-see.org, meteo.see-grid-sci.eu, seismo.see-grid-sci.eu, env.see-grid-sci.eu, desktopgrid.vo.edges-grid.eu, vo.aginfra.eu). 30% of the resources is allocated to the national VO, 50% to regional and projects specific VOs and 20% to High Energy Physics VOs.  
| The NGI does not own any resources (resources are owned by the sites).
| The NGI does not own any resources (resources are owned by the sites).  
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 61: Line 63:
|-
|-
| NGI_BA  
| NGI_BA  
|  
| Policies are defined by NGI members/sites.
|  
| The NGI does not own any resources - all resources are owned by members / sites.
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 77: Line 79:
| NGI_CH  
| NGI_CH  
| Supported VOs by the Swiss EGI sites: ATLAS, CMS, LHCB + SMSCG project VOs (LTPC, CRYPTO, ECON, LIFE, EARTH, TUTOR). Cores: 2144 cores, ATLAS 58%, CMS 32%, LHCB 8%, SMSCG 1.4%. Storage: 2082 TB, ATLAS 50.6%, CMS 48.4%, SMSCG VOs 1.1%  
| Supported VOs by the Swiss EGI sites: ATLAS, CMS, LHCB + SMSCG project VOs (LTPC, CRYPTO, ECON, LIFE, EARTH, TUTOR). Cores: 2144 cores, ATLAS 58%, CMS 32%, LHCB 8%, SMSCG 1.4%. Storage: 2082 TB, ATLAS 50.6%, CMS 48.4%, SMSCG VOs 1.1%  
| The NGI does not own any resources.
| The NGI does not own any resources.  
| SMSCG cores are unprivileged i.e. they are not dedicated at all times to the SMSCG VOs. A minor part of the ATLAS cores (330 cores) is also unprivileged.
| SMSCG cores are unprivileged i.e. they are not dedicated at all times to the SMSCG VOs. A minor part of the ATLAS cores (330 cores) is also unprivileged.
|-
|-
Line 86: Line 88:
|-
|-
| NGI_CZ  
| NGI_CZ  
| VOs supported on sites are mostly defined by sites themselves (NGI doesn't own these resources), based on involvement of their users (for example LHC VOs or Auger), with small fraction usable by other VOs promoted by NGI (VOCE, Auger) On resources provided by NGI we support mostly smaller VOs, either backed up by some local group of users or VOs which are in early stage of building.
| VOs supported on sites are mostly defined by sites themselves (NGI doesn't own these resources), based on involvement of their users (for example LHC VOs or Auger), with small fraction usable by other VOs promoted by NGI (VOCE, Auger) On resources provided by NGI we support mostly smaller VOs, either backed up by some local group of users or VOs which are in early stage of building.  
| Yes, thery are used mostly as seed resources for new VOs.
| Yes, thery are used mostly as seed resources for new VOs.  
|  
|  
|-
|-
| NGI_DE  
| NGI_DE  
| No overall policy, polices are defined by the owners of the ressources.
| No overall policy, polices are defined by the owners of the ressources.  
| No. Resources are owned by communities and/or sites.
| No. Resources are owned by communities and/or sites.  
| -
| -
|-
|-
Line 101: Line 103:
|-
|-
| NGI_FRANCE  
| NGI_FRANCE  
| Policies are defined by ressources'owners. The catch-all national VO is supported on a volunteer basis for an opportunistic use.
| Policies are defined by ressources'owners. The catch-all national VO is supported on a volunteer basis for an opportunistic use.  
| No. Resources are owned by sites.
| No. Resources are owned by sites.  
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 111: Line 113:
|-
|-
| NGI_GRNET  
| NGI_GRNET  
|  
| yes 60 % ouf our resources is dedicated to National and Regional VOs
|  
| Yes 6 out of 12 Sites belong to the NGI Coordinator the rest are offered by Universities participating in the NGI / JRU
|  
| Individual sites not owned by the NGI may have different resource allocation policy
|-
|-
| NGI_HR  
| NGI_HR  
| Resources integrated into EGI infrastructure are currently allocated to HEP, biomed and regional (VOCE) VOs. We use fair share model for allocating all resources. Requests from new VOs will be evaluated by the NGI board.
| Resources integrated into EGI infrastructure are currently allocated to HEP, biomed and regional (VOCE) VOs. We use fair share model for allocating all resources. Requests from new VOs will be evaluated by the NGI board.  
| NGI owns resources and enforces policies.
| NGI owns resources and enforces policies.  
|
|  
|-
|-
| NGI_HU  
| NGI_HU  
| 5% allocated to the Hungrid VO; the rest depends on the sites, mainly used by LHC VOs.
| 5% allocated to the Hungrid VO; the rest depends on the sites, mainly used by LHC VOs.  
| Resources are owned by the sites.
| Resources are owned by the sites.  
|  
|  
|-
|-
| NGI_IE  
| NGI_IE  
|  
| A portion of resources are reserved for Irish users and VOs. Other VOs supported based on NGI Ops.Centre decision. Fair share quotas applied for compute and storage quotas applied.
|  
| Bulk of resources nationally-funded and owned by TCD and all operated centrally by NGI_IE Operations Centre.
|  
| The policy is implemented through e.g. batch system fair-share quotas, so in practice VOs with heavier usage requirements get more resources.
|-
|-
| NGI_IL  
| NGI_IL  
Line 136: Line 138:
|-
|-
| NGI_IT  
| NGI_IT  
|  
| VOs supported on sites are mostly defined by agreements between VOs and sites themselves (NGI doesn't own these resources). ~10% of the resources in Italy is usually allocated for unfunded VOs (best effort level).
|  
| The NGI does not own any resources, but owns and provides the core services also for unfunded VOs.
|  
| The policy (~10% of resources for unfunded VOs) expresses a recommendation but is not enforced at any level.
|-
|-
| NGI_MARGI  
| NGI_MARGI  
Line 146: Line 148:
|-
|-
| NGI_MD  
| NGI_MD  
| 50% of resources used by national VOs, other 50% allocated to Atlas and biomed VOs
| 50% of resources used by national VOs, other 50% allocated to Atlas, Alice, Biomed, LHCb & CMS VOs
| All resources owned by NGI
| All resources owned by NGI  
|  
|  
|-
|-
| NGI_ME  
| NGI_ME  
|  
| Policies are defined by sites.   
|  
| Resources are owned by  sites.  
|  
|  
|-
|-
| NGI_NL  
| NGI_NL  
| The Dutch NGI BiGGrid pledges resources to a few international VOs like ATLAS, LHCb and ALICE and LOFAR. Apart from those VOs, BiGGrid supports a number of smaller, mostly national, VOs. Typically, individual users and user groups apply for resources (computational, storage, support) to BiGGrid for the period of one year. If awarded, the users are often added to one of the national VOs that fits with their type of research, for example, a life scientist will be added to the life sciences grid VO '''lsgrid'''. If no VO fits, a new VO will be created. The awarding of proposals is done by BiGGrid in close cooperation with the sites. In this process, it is also determined how much a site will contribute to the resource request. Here we mention that the organisational infrastructure of BiGGrid consists to a large extend out of site representatives.
| The Dutch NGI BiGGrid pledges resources to a few international VOs like ATLAS, LHCb and ALICE and LOFAR. Apart from those VOs, BiGGrid supports a number of smaller, mostly national, VOs. Typically, individual users and user groups apply for resources (computational, storage, support) to BiGGrid for the period of one year. If awarded, the users are often added to one of the national VOs that fits with their type of research, for example, a life scientist will be added to the life sciences grid VO '''lsgrid'''. If no VO fits, a new VO will be created. The awarding of proposals is done by BiGGrid in close cooperation with the sites. In this process, it is also determined how much a site will contribute to the resource request. Here we mention that the organisational infrastructure of BiGGrid consists to a large extend out of site representatives.  
 
| yes  
| yes
|  
|  
|-
|-
| NGI_PL  
| NGI_PL  
| Resources can be allocated only for research done in association with Polish science, which includes international VOs with Polish participation. Resource Allocation is done based on SLAs negotiated with national VO representatives (usually Polish member of this VO). The SLA specifies allocation at sites. In case when new national VO representative need to be established they should contact NGI_PL through either GGUS or Helpdesk@plgrid.pl.  
| Resources can be allocated only for research done in association with Polish science, which includes international VOs with Polish participation. Resource Allocation is done based on SLAs negotiated with national VO representatives (usually Polish member of this VO). The SLA specifies allocation at sites. In case when new national VO representative need to be established they should contact NGI_PL through either GGUS or Helpdesk@plgrid.pl.  
| The resources are owned by sites, however the NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation in a pool of 25 000 cores and 1 PB of storage space.
| The resources are owned by sites, however the NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation in a pool of 25 000 cores and 1 PB of storage space.  
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 177: Line 178:
|-
|-
| NGI_SK  
| NGI_SK  
| Resource allocation depends on sites. 75% of computing resources and 96% of storage capacity is managed by sites dedicated to LHC VOs.
| Resource allocation depends on sites. 75% of computing resources and 96% of storage capacity is managed by sites dedicated to LHC VOs.  
| Resources are owned by sites.
| Resources are owned by sites.  
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 192: Line 193:
|-
|-
| NGI_UK  
| NGI_UK  
|  
| Most UK resource is procided by funding bodies for use by specific VOs. UK sites are asked to keep back 1% of their resources for use by VOs other than those the site is funded to support. The NGI encourages sites to support a range of VOs including those that EGI.eu encourages from time to time. When these other VOs have access to a site they get access to unused resources allocated to the funded VOs through the fair share scheduler.
|  
| No cpu or disk.
|  
| This policy has delivered large amounts of resource to VOs which the UK does not specifically fund.
|  
|  
|-
|-
Line 210: Line 211:
| The resources are owned by the sites, and therefore, the sites are free to decide the VOs they wish to support. However, to be part of IBERGRID, we do request that the sites support one or more of the ibergrid macro VOs ('''phys.vo.ibergrid.eu, life.vo.ibergrid.eu, eng.vo.ibergrid.eu, ict.vo.ibergrid.eu, earth.vo.ibergrid.eu, social.vo.ibergrid.eu, chem.vo.ibergrid.eu''') according to one of the following classes:  
| The resources are owned by the sites, and therefore, the sites are free to decide the VOs they wish to support. However, to be part of IBERGRID, we do request that the sites support one or more of the ibergrid macro VOs ('''phys.vo.ibergrid.eu, life.vo.ibergrid.eu, eng.vo.ibergrid.eu, ict.vo.ibergrid.eu, earth.vo.ibergrid.eu, social.vo.ibergrid.eu, chem.vo.ibergrid.eu''') according to one of the following classes:  
*'''Sites AAA''': ''A minimum of 200 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits''  
*'''Sites AAA''': ''A minimum of 200 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits''  
*'''Sites AA''': ''A minimum of 100 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits''
*'''Sites AA''': ''A minimum of 100 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits''  
*'''Sites A''': ''A minimum of 50 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole)''
*'''Sites A''': ''A minimum of 50 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole)''  
*'''Sites B''': ''The VO is configured, but no resources are reserved. Only oportunistic runs are foreseen to happen''
*'''Sites B''': ''The VO is configured, but no resources are reserved. Only oportunistic runs are foreseen to happen''
| The majority of resources are owned by sites. Only one site is owned by the NGI with 1248 slots and 275 TB of storage. The NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation of some of the computing slots, as described above.
 
| The majority of resources are owned by sites. Only one site is owned by the NGI with 1248 slots and 275 TB of storage. The NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation of some of the computing slots, as described above.  
|  
|  
|-
|-
| Spain  
| Spain  
| The resources are owned by the sites, and therefore, the sites are free to decide the VOs they wish to support. However, to be part of IBERGRID, we do request that the sites support one or more of the ibergrid macro VOs ('''phys.vo.ibergrid.eu, life.vo.ibergrid.eu, eng.vo.ibergrid.eu, ict.vo.ibergrid.eu, earth.vo.ibergrid.eu, social.vo.ibergrid.eu, chem.vo.ibergrid.eu''') according to one of the following classes:  
| The resources are owned by the sites, and therefore, the sites are free to decide the VOs they wish to support. However, to be part of IBERGRID, we do request that the sites support one or more of the ibergrid macro VOs ('''phys.vo.ibergrid.eu, life.vo.ibergrid.eu, eng.vo.ibergrid.eu, ict.vo.ibergrid.eu, earth.vo.ibergrid.eu, social.vo.ibergrid.eu, chem.vo.ibergrid.eu''') according to one of the following classes:  
*'''Sites AAA''': ''A minimum of 200 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits''
*'''Sites AAA''': ''A minimum of 200 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits''  
*'''Sites AA''': ''A minimum of 100 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits'',
*'''Sites AA''': ''A minimum of 100 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits'',  
*'''Sites A''': ''A minimum of 50 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole)'',
*'''Sites A''': ''A minimum of 50 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole)'',  
*'''Sites B''': ''The VO is configured, but no resources are reserved. Only oportunistic runs are foreseen to happen''.
*'''Sites B''': ''The VO is configured, but no resources are reserved. Only oportunistic runs are foreseen to happen''.
| The resources are owned by sites, however the NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation of some of the computing slots, as described above.
 
| The resources are owned by sites, however the NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation of some of the computing slots, as described above.  
|  
|  
|-
|-

Latest revision as of 14:42, 15 October 2012

Main EGI.eu operations services Support Documentation Tools Activities Performance Technology Catch-all Services Resource Allocation Security


DEADLINE for reply: 07 September 2012

NGI Resource Allocation Policy and applicable VOs Does the NGI own resources? Comments
Example: NGI_XY 10% of the resources in each NGI site is allocated to Life Science VOs. This amount increases to 20% in site XY. All other disciplines access the remaining 80% of the provided capacity. The NGI owns a pool of 500 cores and 10 TB to be allocated to VOs according to the NGI priorities. The policy expresses a recommendation but is not enforced at site level.
AsiaPacific
Austria
CERN
Denmark
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
NGI_AEGIS VOs supported by the AEGIS sites: national VO (aegis), High Energy Physics VOs (atlas, cms), regional and projects specific VOs (see, seegrid, sgdemo, ops.vo.egee-see.org, meteo.see-grid-sci.eu, seismo.see-grid-sci.eu, env.see-grid-sci.eu, desktopgrid.vo.edges-grid.eu, vo.aginfra.eu). 30% of the resources is allocated to the national VO, 50% to regional and projects specific VOs and 20% to High Energy Physics VOs. The NGI does not own any resources (resources are owned by the sites).
NGI_ARMGRID
NGI_BA Policies are defined by NGI members/sites. The NGI does not own any resources - all resources are owned by members / sites.
NGI_BG
NGI_BY
NGI_CH Supported VOs by the Swiss EGI sites: ATLAS, CMS, LHCB + SMSCG project VOs (LTPC, CRYPTO, ECON, LIFE, EARTH, TUTOR). Cores: 2144 cores, ATLAS 58%, CMS 32%, LHCB 8%, SMSCG 1.4%. Storage: 2082 TB, ATLAS 50.6%, CMS 48.4%, SMSCG VOs 1.1% The NGI does not own any resources. SMSCG cores are unprivileged i.e. they are not dedicated at all times to the SMSCG VOs. A minor part of the ATLAS cores (330 cores) is also unprivileged.
NGI_CYGRID
NGI_CZ VOs supported on sites are mostly defined by sites themselves (NGI doesn't own these resources), based on involvement of their users (for example LHC VOs or Auger), with small fraction usable by other VOs promoted by NGI (VOCE, Auger) On resources provided by NGI we support mostly smaller VOs, either backed up by some local group of users or VOs which are in early stage of building. Yes, thery are used mostly as seed resources for new VOs.
NGI_DE No overall policy, polices are defined by the owners of the ressources. No. Resources are owned by communities and/or sites. -
NGI_FI
NGI_FRANCE Policies are defined by ressources'owners. The catch-all national VO is supported on a volunteer basis for an opportunistic use. No. Resources are owned by sites.
NGI_GE Taking into account still low demand there is no need in Resource Allocation Policy. The NGI owns 12 cores and 1 TB storage resource. According to the project submitted to the National Science Foundation we are planning to upgrade existing infrastructure and attract new users, after that we will implement Resource Allocation Policy.
NGI_GRNET yes 60 % ouf our resources is dedicated to National and Regional VOs Yes 6 out of 12 Sites belong to the NGI Coordinator the rest are offered by Universities participating in the NGI / JRU Individual sites not owned by the NGI may have different resource allocation policy
NGI_HR Resources integrated into EGI infrastructure are currently allocated to HEP, biomed and regional (VOCE) VOs. We use fair share model for allocating all resources. Requests from new VOs will be evaluated by the NGI board. NGI owns resources and enforces policies.
NGI_HU 5% allocated to the Hungrid VO; the rest depends on the sites, mainly used by LHC VOs. Resources are owned by the sites.
NGI_IE A portion of resources are reserved for Irish users and VOs. Other VOs supported based on NGI Ops.Centre decision. Fair share quotas applied for compute and storage quotas applied. Bulk of resources nationally-funded and owned by TCD and all operated centrally by NGI_IE Operations Centre. The policy is implemented through e.g. batch system fair-share quotas, so in practice VOs with heavier usage requirements get more resources.
NGI_IL
NGI_IT VOs supported on sites are mostly defined by agreements between VOs and sites themselves (NGI doesn't own these resources). ~10% of the resources in Italy is usually allocated for unfunded VOs (best effort level). The NGI does not own any resources, but owns and provides the core services also for unfunded VOs. The policy (~10% of resources for unfunded VOs) expresses a recommendation but is not enforced at any level.
NGI_MARGI
NGI_MD 50% of resources used by national VOs, other 50% allocated to Atlas, Alice, Biomed, LHCb & CMS VOs All resources owned by NGI
NGI_ME Policies are defined by sites.    Resources are owned by  sites.  
NGI_NL The Dutch NGI BiGGrid pledges resources to a few international VOs like ATLAS, LHCb and ALICE and LOFAR. Apart from those VOs, BiGGrid supports a number of smaller, mostly national, VOs. Typically, individual users and user groups apply for resources (computational, storage, support) to BiGGrid for the period of one year. If awarded, the users are often added to one of the national VOs that fits with their type of research, for example, a life scientist will be added to the life sciences grid VO lsgrid. If no VO fits, a new VO will be created. The awarding of proposals is done by BiGGrid in close cooperation with the sites. In this process, it is also determined how much a site will contribute to the resource request. Here we mention that the organisational infrastructure of BiGGrid consists to a large extend out of site representatives. yes
NGI_PL Resources can be allocated only for research done in association with Polish science, which includes international VOs with Polish participation. Resource Allocation is done based on SLAs negotiated with national VO representatives (usually Polish member of this VO). The SLA specifies allocation at sites. In case when new national VO representative need to be established they should contact NGI_PL through either GGUS or Helpdesk@plgrid.pl. The resources are owned by sites, however the NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation in a pool of 25 000 cores and 1 PB of storage space.
NGI_RO
NGI_SI
NGI_SK Resource allocation depends on sites. 75% of computing resources and 96% of storage capacity is managed by sites dedicated to LHC VOs. Resources are owned by sites.
NGI_TR 80% of the resources in TR-03-METU site is allocated to CMS VO, 80% of the resources in TR-10-ULAKBIM site is allocated to ATLAS VO, 80% of the resources in TR-01-ULAKBIM site is allocated to local VOs. All other disciplines except these can access the remaining 20% of the provided capacities in related sites. The NGI owns a pool of 12000 cores and 1.2 PB to be allocated to VOs according to the NGI priorities. NGI_TR infrastructure is supported by Ministry of Development this year and will be supported in the next three years.
NGI_UA
NGI_UK Most UK resource is procided by funding bodies for use by specific VOs. UK sites are asked to keep back 1% of their resources for use by VOs other than those the site is funded to support. The NGI encourages sites to support a range of VOs including those that EGI.eu encourages from time to time. When these other VOs have access to a site they get access to unused resources allocated to the funded VOs through the fair share scheduler. No cpu or disk. This policy has delivered large amounts of resource to VOs which the UK does not specifically fund.
NGI_ZA
Norway
Portugal The resources are owned by the sites, and therefore, the sites are free to decide the VOs they wish to support. However, to be part of IBERGRID, we do request that the sites support one or more of the ibergrid macro VOs (phys.vo.ibergrid.eu, life.vo.ibergrid.eu, eng.vo.ibergrid.eu, ict.vo.ibergrid.eu, earth.vo.ibergrid.eu, social.vo.ibergrid.eu, chem.vo.ibergrid.eu) according to one of the following classes:
  • Sites AAA: A minimum of 200 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits
  • Sites AA: A minimum of 100 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits
  • Sites A: A minimum of 50 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole)
  • Sites B: The VO is configured, but no resources are reserved. Only oportunistic runs are foreseen to happen
The majority of resources are owned by sites. Only one site is owned by the NGI with 1248 slots and 275 TB of storage. The NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation of some of the computing slots, as described above.
Spain The resources are owned by the sites, and therefore, the sites are free to decide the VOs they wish to support. However, to be part of IBERGRID, we do request that the sites support one or more of the ibergrid macro VOs (phys.vo.ibergrid.eu, life.vo.ibergrid.eu, eng.vo.ibergrid.eu, ict.vo.ibergrid.eu, earth.vo.ibergrid.eu, social.vo.ibergrid.eu, chem.vo.ibergrid.eu) according to one of the following classes:
  • Sites AAA: A minimum of 200 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits
  • Sites AA: A minimum of 100 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole) at any time with HIGH PRIORITY. Jobs arriving to that site will enter in execution at the earliest possibility the cluster occupation permits,
  • Sites A: A minimum of 50 slots are available for the Ibergrid VOs (as a whole),
  • Sites B: The VO is configured, but no resources are reserved. Only oportunistic runs are foreseen to happen.
The resources are owned by sites, however the NGI coordinates and has some influence on allocation of some of the computing slots, as described above.
Sweden
ROC_Canada
ROC_IGALC
ROC_LA
Russia