Difference between revisions of "NGI International Task Review MS124"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
#[[NGI International Task Review MS124 Czech Republic|Czech Republic]] | #[[NGI International Task Review MS124 Czech Republic|Czech Republic]] | ||
#[[NGI International Task Review MS124 Denmark|Denmark]] | #[[NGI International Task Review MS124 Denmark|Denmark]] | ||
#[[NGI International Task Review MS124 Estonia|Estonia]] | |||
#[[NGI International Task Review MS124 Finland|Finland]] | #[[NGI International Task Review MS124 Finland|Finland]] | ||
#[[NGI International Task Review MS124 France|France]] | #[[NGI International Task Review MS124 France|France]] |
Latest revision as of 12:33, 26 February 2013
This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS124 "NGI International Tasks Review".
Assessment by Service
Each NGI should complete its dedicated page following these guidelines:
- Name: name of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in).
- Description: description of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in).
- Assessment: an assessment of services from a managerial perspective, reported as an evaluation of the services (e.g. objectives being met; resources to effort; issues).
- 'DO NOT' report what your NGI did for those tasks/services as this is covered by the Quarterly Reports.
- Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction.
- 0 = Not applicable.
- 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered.
- 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered.
- 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered.
- 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
- 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice.
- How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed in order to improve the NGI service during 2013 and the solutions you would like to propose; suggest strategic changes; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service; etc.
- After EGI-InSPIRE: comment on the continuation or service impact at the end of EC funding regarding the EGI-InSPIRE task/service.
Complete the page for your NGI
- Albania
- Armenia
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Macedonia
- Moldova
- Montenegro
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Turkey
- United Kingdom