Difference between revisions of "NGI International Task Review MS124"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Name''': name of the service as defined in [[EGI-InSPIRE-Tasks-Y3#NGI_International_Tasks|this wiki page]] (''already filled in'') | *'''Name''': name of the service as defined in [[EGI-InSPIRE-Tasks-Y3#NGI_International_Tasks|this wiki page]] (''already filled in'') | ||
*'''Description''': description of the service as defined in [[EGI-InSPIRE-Tasks-Y3#NGI_International_Tasks|this wiki page]] (''already filled in'') | *'''Description''': description of the service as defined in [[EGI-InSPIRE-Tasks-Y3#NGI_International_Tasks|this wiki page]] (''already filled in'') | ||
*'''Assessment''': an assessment from a managerial perspective, which should be reported as an evaluation of the services | *'''Assessment''': an assessment from a managerial perspective, which should be reported as an evaluation of the services (e.g. objectives being met; resources to effort; issues; suggested strategic changes)<br> | ||
**'DO NOT' report what your NGI did for those tasks/services as this is covered by the Quarterly Reports. | |||
*'''Score''': assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction | *'''Score''': assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction | ||
**0 = Not applicable | **0 = Not applicable |
Revision as of 14:45, 11 February 2013
This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS124 "NGI International Tasks Review".
Assessment by Service
Each NGI should complete its dedicated page following these guidelines:
- Name: name of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in)
- Description: description of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in)
- Assessment: an assessment from a managerial perspective, which should be reported as an evaluation of the services (e.g. objectives being met; resources to effort; issues; suggested strategic changes)
- 'DO NOT' report what your NGI did for those tasks/services as this is covered by the Quarterly Reports.
- Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
- 0 = Not applicable
- 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
- 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
- 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
- 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
- 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
- How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed in order to improve the NGI service during 2012 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service
- After EGI-InSPIRE: comment on the continuation or service impact at the end of EC funding regarding the EGI-InSPIRE task/service
Complete the page for your NGI
- Albania
- Armenia
- Belarus
- Belgium
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Macedonia
- Moldova
- Montenegro
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Turkey
- United Kingdom