Difference between revisions of "DCH-RP:PoC Phase 2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
! KANUT | ! KANUT | ||
! Andres Uueni | ! Andres Uueni | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan=3 style="text-align: left; vertical-align: top;" | 3. Evaluate EUDAT storage services | ! rowspan=3 style="text-align: left; vertical-align: top;" | 3. Evaluate EUDAT storage services | ||
Line 71: | Line 64: | ||
| Tim Devenport | | Tim Devenport | ||
|} | |} | ||
'''Note:''' Experiment 2 "Evaluate SCIDIP-ES preservation services" is discontinued. No project participant took up responsibility to conduct this experiment. | |||
[[Category:Proofs Of Concept 2]] | [[Category:Proofs Of Concept 2]] |
Latest revision as of 14:37, 31 March 2014
WP5: Proofs of Concept | Scenarios | PoC Phase 1 | PoC Phase 2 | DCH Glossary |
The second Proof of Concept phase focuses more on existing infrastructures and tools that were developed and or used already by other projects run by scientific communities that have data preservation needs.
The following experiments are agreed to be conducted during the second Proof of Concept:
Title | Scenarios | Teams | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Role | Country | Institute | Name | ||
1. Evaluate SCAPE preservation tools | 3.3 | Lead | EE | KANUT | Andres Uueni |
3. Evaluate EUDAT storage services | Lead | PL | PSNC | Maciej Brzeźniak | |
Platform tester | SE | RA | Eva Toller | ||
Data provider | BE | BELSPO | Rosette Vandenbroucke | ||
4. Re-run experiment for Scenario 1.1 & 1.4 | 1.1, 1.4 | Lead | IT | ICCU | Giovanni Ciccaglioni |
5. A (long term) Data Preservation platform | 3.1a, 3.2, 1.5 | Lead | DE | FTK e.V. | Claus-Peter Klas |
Data provider | UK | CT | Gordon McKenna | ||
Journal publisher | UK | Editeur | Tim Devenport |
Note: Experiment 2 "Evaluate SCIDIP-ES preservation services" is discontinued. No project participant took up responsibility to conduct this experiment.