VT Scientific Publications Repository Meetings/2012-07-10
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
EGI Activity groups | Special Interest groups | Policy groups | Virtual teams | Distributed Competence Centres |
EGI Virtual teams: | Main • | Active Projects • | Closed Projects • | Guidelines |
VT Scientific Publications Repository: | VT Scientific Publications Repository • | Tasks • | Meetings & Actions |
Meeting 10 July 2012 - 10-11 CEST
Agenda
- Agenda bashing
- Minutes approval
- Actions review
- AOB
Participants
- Sergio Andreozzi, EGI.eu
- Genevieve Romier, NGI-FR
- Burcu Ortakaya, NGI TR
Apologize:
- Catherine Gater, EGI.eu
- Sara Coelho, EGI.eu
- Torsten Antoni, NGI-DE
- Wilhelm Bühler, NGI-DE
- Vicky Huang, APGI-ASGC
Minutes
- Minutes Approval
- Approved
- Actions Review
- Genevieve: document best practices for French NGI
- Done
- Wilhelm: document best practice for bwGrid project
- Publication in bwGRiD are not handled at KIT directly, he is in contact with the responsible person and will report next week.
- Vicky: document best practices for APAC area
- Sergio: document best practices for XSEDE
- sent two emails, no answer so far
- Sara: document best practices for NGI-NL (and other mature initiatives)
- done, to be shared
- Sergio: document best practices for NRENs/GEANT
- Contacted TERENA: no aware of any process
- Burcu: document best practices for PRACE
- after a first investigation, it seems they do not have a public repository; will contact PRACE task leader related
- Burcu: document best practices for NGI TR
- work in progress, almost done; explaining the process, advantages/disadvantages;
- Genevieve: investigate the OpenAire initiative (http://www.openaire.eu/)
- what are the opportunities and limitations? should we integrate with them? what repositories are available maintained by organisations involved in EGI? Can/should we use one of these repositories or set up an EGI one, should we give freedom of choice among the available ones?
- Sergio: what obligations can be defined, where should be defined, how researchers accept them
- Sara: communication plan (on hold, waiting for a defined process for EGI)
- AOB
- none