Difference between revisions of "Track User Support Requirements"
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| 30 Nov 2010 | | 30 Nov 2010 | ||
| Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: only 1 reply received so far: https://rt.egi.eu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=704<br> | | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: only 1 reply received so far: https://rt.egi.eu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=704<br> | ||
Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement | Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement<br> | ||
1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | 1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| 30 Nov 2010 | | 30 Nov 2010 | ||
| Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet.<br> | | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet.<br> | ||
Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement | Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement<br> | ||
1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | 1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| 30 Nov 2010 | | 30 Nov 2010 | ||
| Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet.<br> | | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet.<br> | ||
Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement | Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement<br> | ||
1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | 1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| 30 Nov 2010 | | 30 Nov 2010 | ||
| Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet.<br> | | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet.<br> | ||
Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement | Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement<br> | ||
1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | 1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | ||
<!--- | <!--- | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| 30 Nov 2010 | | 30 Nov 2010 | ||
| Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet.<br> | | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet.<br> | ||
Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement | Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement<br> | ||
1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | 1st of April 2011: UCST sent reminder to those who didnt replied. Still they have 20days to reply, after the ticket will be set to "Resolved". | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 14:50, 1 April 2011
Main | Submit | Track |
UMD (TCB) | Operations (OMB) | User Support (UCB) |
Status at UCB
Name of the topic | Related requirements | Date when has been flagged as priotiry topic by the UBC | Current status |
---|---|---|---|
1.Increased stability and scalability for gLite WMS | Extension:RSS -- Error: "https://service-requirements:Teoer02i@rt.egi.eu/requirements/Search/Results.rdf?Order=DESC&OrderBy=Created&Query=Queue%20%3D%20'requirements'%20AND%20'CF.{Custom%20Tag}'%20%3D%20'ucb1'" is not in the list of allowed feeds. There are no allowed feed URLs in the list. | 30 Nov 2010 | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: only 1 reply received so far: https://rt.egi.eu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=704 Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement |
2.Better (more verbose and informative) error messages | Extension:RSS -- Error: "https://service-requirements:Teoer02i@rt.egi.eu/requirements/Search/Results.rdf?Order=DESC&OrderBy=Created&Query=Queue%20%3D%20'requirements'%20AND%20'CF.{Custom%20Tag}'%20%3D%20'ucb2'" is not in the list of allowed feeds. There are no allowed feed URLs in the list. | 30 Nov 2010 | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet. Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement |
3.Fixing the known bugs before adding new features | Extension:RSS -- Error: "https://service-requirements:Teoer02i@rt.egi.eu/requirements/Search/Results.rdf?Order=DESC&OrderBy=Created&Query=Queue%20%3D%20'requirements'%20AND%20'CF.{Custom%20Tag}'%20%3D%20'ucb3'" is not in the list of allowed feeds. There are no allowed feed URLs in the list. | 30 Nov 2010 | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet. Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement |
4.Coherency of command line commands, parameters and APIs | Extension:RSS -- Error: "https://service-requirements:Teoer02i@rt.egi.eu/requirements/Search/Results.rdf?Order=DESC&OrderBy=Created&Query=Queue%20%3D%20'requirements'%20AND%20'CF.{Custom%20Tag}'%20%3D%20'ucb4'" is not in the list of allowed feeds. There are no allowed feed URLs in the list. | 30 Nov 2010 | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet. Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement |
5.Better feedback about jobs, automated resubmission of jobs that are stuck on sites | Extension:RSS -- Error: "https://service-requirements:Teoer02i@rt.egi.eu/requirements/Search/Results.rdf?Order=DESC&OrderBy=Created&Query=Queue%20%3D%20'requirements'%20AND%20'CF.{Custom%20Tag}'%20%3D%20'ucb5'" is not in the list of allowed feeds. There are no allowed feed URLs in the list. | 30 Nov 2010 | Jan 2011: UCST asked ticket submitters to provide technical details about the circumstances under which the scalability and stability problems were experienced: no updates received yet. Feb 2011: UCST invited the providers of reusable tools to comment on the requirement |
Requirement Status | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCB Requirements | New | Open | Accepted | Stalled | Resolved | Rejected |
Requirements are discussed at UCB
Board Tag: UCB
Status at TCB
Requirement Status | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCB Requirements | New | Open | Accepted | Stalled | Resolved | Rejected |
Requirements were discussed at UCB and transfered to TCB
Board Tag: UCB_TCB
User Support Status
Requirements in process by User Support
Board Tag: Not equal to UCB, UCB_TCB
Current Statistics
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Category
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Requestor
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Status
History Statistics
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Category
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Requestor
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Status
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Category
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Requestor
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Status
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Category
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Requestor
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Status
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Category
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Requestor
- Example.jpg
User Support tickets per Status