The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.
Difference between revisions of "EGI Quality Criteria Release 4"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Deficiencies in criteria found in Verification or Stage Rollout: | * Deficiencies in criteria found in Verification or Stage Rollout: | ||
** Removal of GENERIC_DIST_2 | ** Removal of non testeable criteria: GENERIC_DIST_2, AUTHZ_ PDP_1, ACC_JOBSCH_1 | ||
* Recommendations and issues found by the Software Vulnerability Group: | * Recommendations and issues found by the Software Vulnerability Group: | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
*** Changed AUTHZ_ PCYDEF_3 to not mandatory, better wording | *** Changed AUTHZ_ PCYDEF_3 to not mandatory, better wording | ||
*** Removal of AUTHZ_PEP_1 | *** Removal of AUTHZ_PEP_1 | ||
*** Review of AUTHZ_PEP_2 | *** Review of AUTHZ_PEP_2, AUTHZ_PCYDEF_4 | ||
Revision as of 12:27, 18 May 2012
| Technology | Software Component Delivery | Software Provisioning | UMD Middleware | Cloud Middleware Distribution | Containers Distribution | Technology Glossary |
| Quality Assurance | | Quality Criteria Definition | | Quality Criteria Dissemination | | Quality Criteria Verification | | Verifier Guideline | | Verification Testbed | | Glossary |
These release notes describe the fourth release of the Quality Criteria for UMD software.
Detailed Changelog
- Requirements from User Community
- None
- Requirements from Operations Community (especially software incidents found in production)
- Review of criteria GENERIC_SERVICE_1 (from RT#1201)
- Review of criteria GENERIC_SERVICE_2 (from RT#1357)
- New Criteria related with VOMS (from RT #): ATTAUTH_ MGMT_6, GENERIC_DOC_10, GENERIC_DOC_11
- Deficiencies in criteria found in Verification or Stage Rollout:
- Removal of non testeable criteria: GENERIC_DIST_2, AUTHZ_ PDP_1, ACC_JOBSCH_1
- Recommendations and issues found by the Software Vulnerability Group:
- None
- Analysis of reference implementations of UMD Capabilities defined in the Roadmap:
- None
- Review and analysis of feedback from Technology Providers
- Review of AuthZ & AuthN QC:
- Changed AUTHZ_ PCYDEF_3 to not mandatory, better wording
- Removal of AUTHZ_PEP_1
- Review of AUTHZ_PEP_2, AUTHZ_PCYDEF_4
- Review of AuthZ & AuthN QC: