Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE:MS108 Grid oversight"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
|O_Task_number = #
|O_Task_number = #
|O_Task_name = Grid oversight
|O_Task_name = Grid oversight
|O_Task_assessment = write here
|O_Task_assessment = Currently we are quite happy with how things are going. The Polish and Dutch NGI both contribute to this activity in a coordinating role. All NGIs contribute to this activity by peforming grid oversight in their own region. Most NGIs do this quite well. Sometimes corrective action needs to be taken when a NGIs are not carrying out their task according to grid oversight standards. But this is within acceptable limits and all in all I would say that things are under control. I am also very happy with the Polish-Dutch collaboration. This has proven to be very effective. With respect with
|O_Task_score = write here
|O_Task_score = write here
|O_Task_howtoimprove = write here
|O_Task_howtoimprove = write here

Revision as of 16:10, 10 March 2011


Notes to contributors

Assessment: (Provide an assessment of the delivery of services over the past year from a managerial perspective; highlight positive areas and areas for improvement; do not include future plans; text should be roughly 1-2 paragraphs)

Score: (assign a numerical score from 1 to 5 with a succinct explanation of what needs to be improved to increase your score – remove numerical description references upon completion) 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered

2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered

3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered

4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement

5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice


Table 4: EGI Global task assessment:Grid oversight
# Name Assessment Score How to Improve
# Grid oversight Currently we are quite happy with how things are going. The Polish and Dutch NGI both contribute to this activity in a coordinating role. All NGIs contribute to this activity by peforming grid oversight in their own region. Most NGIs do this quite well. Sometimes corrective action needs to be taken when a NGIs are not carrying out their task according to grid oversight standards. But this is within acceptable limits and all in all I would say that things are under control. I am also very happy with the Polish-Dutch collaboration. This has proven to be very effective. With respect with write here write here