Difference between revisions of "VT Scientific Publications Repository Current Practices"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
=== NGI France === | === NGI France === | ||
*Scope: identify the scope of collecting publications (infrastructure, geographical boundaries, communities) | *Scope: identify the scope of collecting publications (infrastructure, geographical boundaries, communities) | ||
All disciplines | |||
At least one author working in a French laboratory or organism | **All disciplines | ||
All infrastructures (production or research infrastructures) | **At least one author working in a French laboratory or organism | ||
**All infrastructures (production or research infrastructures) | |||
*What information is collected | *What information is collected | ||
**describe the schema and collect also values for the enumerations, e.g., list of disciplines, type of publications) | **describe the schema and collect also values for the enumerations, e.g., list of disciplines, type of publications) | ||
**describe if you distinguish between conference paper vs. journals or science based on the infrastructure vs. engineering of the infrastructure | **describe if you distinguish between conference paper vs. journals or science based on the infrastructure vs. engineering of the infrastructure | ||
*Do you collect the impact factor? If so, how? (researcher add it, link to a database of impact factors e.g., http://wokinfo.com/) | |||
*How do researchers know that they need to provide the information? | *Do you collect the impact factor? If so, how? (researcher add it, link to a database of impact factors e.g., http://wokinfo.com/) | ||
*How do researchers provide the information? (the tool they use) | |||
NO | |||
*How do researchers know that they need to provide the information? | |||
We advertise by all means : NGI "France Grilles" web site, "France Grilles" newsletter, letter of the director, e-mails in the lists (labs directors, users, operational and sites teams...), presentations at the grid days... and of course reminders. | |||
*How do researchers provide the information? (the tool they use) | |||
#They have to reference (or put) their publications in a national tool build for all the research community in France - all organisms or universities. The tools is http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ | |||
#They have to inform a functional email address or G Romier and to give the hal identifier or the title of the publication | |||
*How do researchers describe the use of the infrastructures in the publication? (provide guidelines) | *How do researchers describe the use of the infrastructures in the publication? (provide guidelines) | ||
*What are the obligations for researchers? Where are they defined? How do the researchers accept them? | *What are the obligations for researchers? Where are they defined? How do the researchers accept them? |
Revision as of 16:29, 9 July 2012
VT Scientific Publications Repository: | VT Scientific Publications Repository • | Tasks • | Meetings & Actions |
Collect Best Practices
This is a list of questions to document best practices from established processes to collect scientific publications that were possible thanks to the use of e-infrastructures
- Scope: identify the scope of collecting publications (infrastructure, geographical boundaries, communities)
- What information is collected
- describe the schema and collect also values for the enumerations, e.g., list of disciplines, type of publications)
- describe if you distinguish between conference paper vs. journals or science based on the infrastructure vs. engineering of the infrastructure
- Do you collect the impact factor? If so, how? (researcher add it, link to a database of impact factors e.g., http://wokinfo.com/)
- How do researchers know that they need to provide the information?
- How do researchers provide the information? (the tool they use)
- How do researchers describe the use of the infrastructures in the publication? (provide guidelines)
- What are the obligations for researchers? Where are they defined? How do the researchers accept them?
- When do researchers provide the data? (e.g., yearly base, as soon as they publish)
- Limitations/difficulties of the current process
- Success stories of the current process
- How many publications are already collected and since when
- How the information is used
javascript:void(0)
NGIs' Best Practices
NGI France
- Scope: identify the scope of collecting publications (infrastructure, geographical boundaries, communities)
- All disciplines
- At least one author working in a French laboratory or organism
- All infrastructures (production or research infrastructures)
- What information is collected
- describe the schema and collect also values for the enumerations, e.g., list of disciplines, type of publications)
- describe if you distinguish between conference paper vs. journals or science based on the infrastructure vs. engineering of the infrastructure
- Do you collect the impact factor? If so, how? (researcher add it, link to a database of impact factors e.g., http://wokinfo.com/)
NO
- How do researchers know that they need to provide the information?
We advertise by all means : NGI "France Grilles" web site, "France Grilles" newsletter, letter of the director, e-mails in the lists (labs directors, users, operational and sites teams...), presentations at the grid days... and of course reminders.
- How do researchers provide the information? (the tool they use)
- They have to reference (or put) their publications in a national tool build for all the research community in France - all organisms or universities. The tools is http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
- They have to inform a functional email address or G Romier and to give the hal identifier or the title of the publication
- How do researchers describe the use of the infrastructures in the publication? (provide guidelines)
- What are the obligations for researchers? Where are they defined? How do the researchers accept them?
- When do researchers provide the data? (e.g., yearly base, as soon as they publish)
- Limitations/difficulties of the current process
- Success stories of the current process
- How many publications are already collected and since when
- How the information is used