The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.
Difference between revisions of "VT Scientific Publications Repository Actions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Actions List == | == Actions List == | ||
=== Open === | |||
* Wilhelm: document best practice for bwGrid project | * Wilhelm: document best practice for bwGrid project | ||
** Publication in bwGRiD are not handled at KIT directly, I’m in contact with the responsible person and will report next week. | |||
* Vicky: document best practices for APAC area | * Vicky: document best practices for APAC area | ||
** no updates | |||
* Sergio: document best practices for XSEDE | * Sergio: document best practices for XSEDE | ||
** sent two emails, no answer so far | |||
* Sara: document best practices for NGI-NL (and other mature initiatives) | * Sara: document best practices for NGI-NL (and other mature initiatives) | ||
* | ** done for NGI-NL, to circulate the document | ||
* Sergio: document best practices for NRENs/GEANT | |||
** Contacted TERENA: no aware of any process | |||
* Burcu: document best practices for PRACE | * Burcu: document best practices for PRACE | ||
** after a first investigation, it seems they do not have a public repository; will contact PRACE task leader related | |||
* Burcu: document best practices for NGI TR | * Burcu: document best practices for NGI TR | ||
** work in progress, almost done; explaining the process, advantages/disadvantages; | |||
* Genevieve: investigate the OpenAire initiative (http://www.openaire.eu/) | * Genevieve: investigate the OpenAire initiative (http://www.openaire.eu/) | ||
** what are the opportunities and limitations? should we integrate with them? what repositories are available maintained by organisations involved in EGI? Can/should we use one of these repositories or set up an EGI one, should we give freedom of choice among the available ones? | ** what are the opportunities and limitations? should we integrate with them? what repositories are available maintained by organisations involved in EGI? Can/should we use one of these repositories or set up an EGI one, should we give freedom of choice among the available ones? | ||
** not started | |||
* Sergio: what obligations can be defined, where should be defined, how researchers accept them | * Sergio: what obligations can be defined, where should be defined, how researchers accept them | ||
** not started | |||
* Sara: communication plan (on hold, waiting for a defined process for EGI) | * Sara: communication plan (on hold, waiting for a defined process for EGI) | ||
** not started | |||
* Sergio: to organise a session at the EGI TF12 to present results and discuss | |||
=== Closed === | |||
* Genevieve: document best practices for French NGI | |||
== Resources == | == Resources == | ||
Revision as of 10:34, 10 July 2012
| VT Scientific Publications Repository: | VT Scientific Publications Repository • | Tasks • | Meetings & Actions |
Actions List
Open
- Wilhelm: document best practice for bwGrid project
- Publication in bwGRiD are not handled at KIT directly, I’m in contact with the responsible person and will report next week.
- Vicky: document best practices for APAC area
- no updates
- Sergio: document best practices for XSEDE
- sent two emails, no answer so far
- Sara: document best practices for NGI-NL (and other mature initiatives)
- done for NGI-NL, to circulate the document
- Sergio: document best practices for NRENs/GEANT
- Contacted TERENA: no aware of any process
- Burcu: document best practices for PRACE
- after a first investigation, it seems they do not have a public repository; will contact PRACE task leader related
- Burcu: document best practices for NGI TR
- work in progress, almost done; explaining the process, advantages/disadvantages;
- Genevieve: investigate the OpenAire initiative (http://www.openaire.eu/)
- what are the opportunities and limitations? should we integrate with them? what repositories are available maintained by organisations involved in EGI? Can/should we use one of these repositories or set up an EGI one, should we give freedom of choice among the available ones?
- not started
- Sergio: what obligations can be defined, where should be defined, how researchers accept them
- not started
- Sara: communication plan (on hold, waiting for a defined process for EGI)
- not started
- Sergio: to organise a session at the EGI TF12 to present results and discuss
Closed
- Genevieve: document best practices for French NGI