Difference between revisions of "VT Scientific Publications Repository Actions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Actions List == | == Actions List == | ||
=== Open === | |||
* Wilhelm: document best practice for bwGrid project | * Wilhelm: document best practice for bwGrid project | ||
** Publication in bwGRiD are not handled at KIT directly, I’m in contact with the responsible person and will report next week. | |||
* Vicky: document best practices for APAC area | * Vicky: document best practices for APAC area | ||
** no updates | |||
* Sergio: document best practices for XSEDE | * Sergio: document best practices for XSEDE | ||
** sent two emails, no answer so far | |||
* Sara: document best practices for NGI-NL (and other mature initiatives) | * Sara: document best practices for NGI-NL (and other mature initiatives) | ||
* | ** done for NGI-NL, to circulate the document | ||
* Sergio: document best practices for NRENs/GEANT | |||
** Contacted TERENA: no aware of any process | |||
* Burcu: document best practices for PRACE | * Burcu: document best practices for PRACE | ||
** after a first investigation, it seems they do not have a public repository; will contact PRACE task leader related | |||
* Burcu: document best practices for NGI TR | * Burcu: document best practices for NGI TR | ||
** work in progress, almost done; explaining the process, advantages/disadvantages; | |||
* Genevieve: investigate the OpenAire initiative (http://www.openaire.eu/) | * Genevieve: investigate the OpenAire initiative (http://www.openaire.eu/) | ||
** what are the opportunities and limitations? should we integrate with them? what repositories are available maintained by organisations involved in EGI? Can/should we use one of these repositories or set up an EGI one, should we give freedom of choice among the available ones? | ** what are the opportunities and limitations? should we integrate with them? what repositories are available maintained by organisations involved in EGI? Can/should we use one of these repositories or set up an EGI one, should we give freedom of choice among the available ones? | ||
** not started | |||
* Sergio: what obligations can be defined, where should be defined, how researchers accept them | * Sergio: what obligations can be defined, where should be defined, how researchers accept them | ||
** not started | |||
* Sara: communication plan (on hold, waiting for a defined process for EGI) | * Sara: communication plan (on hold, waiting for a defined process for EGI) | ||
** not started | |||
* Sergio: to organise a session at the EGI TF12 to present results and discuss | |||
=== Closed === | |||
* Genevieve: document best practices for French NGI | |||
== Resources == | == Resources == |
Revision as of 10:34, 10 July 2012
VT Scientific Publications Repository: | VT Scientific Publications Repository • | Tasks • | Meetings & Actions |
Actions List
Open
- Wilhelm: document best practice for bwGrid project
- Publication in bwGRiD are not handled at KIT directly, I’m in contact with the responsible person and will report next week.
- Vicky: document best practices for APAC area
- no updates
- Sergio: document best practices for XSEDE
- sent two emails, no answer so far
- Sara: document best practices for NGI-NL (and other mature initiatives)
- done for NGI-NL, to circulate the document
- Sergio: document best practices for NRENs/GEANT
- Contacted TERENA: no aware of any process
- Burcu: document best practices for PRACE
- after a first investigation, it seems they do not have a public repository; will contact PRACE task leader related
- Burcu: document best practices for NGI TR
- work in progress, almost done; explaining the process, advantages/disadvantages;
- Genevieve: investigate the OpenAire initiative (http://www.openaire.eu/)
- what are the opportunities and limitations? should we integrate with them? what repositories are available maintained by organisations involved in EGI? Can/should we use one of these repositories or set up an EGI one, should we give freedom of choice among the available ones?
- not started
- Sergio: what obligations can be defined, where should be defined, how researchers accept them
- not started
- Sara: communication plan (on hold, waiting for a defined process for EGI)
- not started
- Sergio: to organise a session at the EGI TF12 to present results and discuss
Closed
- Genevieve: document best practices for French NGI