|(48 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)|
= UMD Quality Criteria =
= UMD Quality Criteria =
All the software included in the
Universal Middleware Distribution (UMD) must meet a set of Quality Criteria defined by EGI. The Quality Criteria can be classified into generic criteria, i.e. criteria which sould hold for any component of the UMD, and specific criteria, i.e. criteria valid for a particular component only.
All the software included in the Middleware Distribution (UMD) must meet a set of Quality Criteria defined by EGI. The Quality Criteria can be classified into generic criteria, i.e. criteria which sould hold for any component of the UMD, and specific criteria, i.e. criteria valid for a particular component only.
In order to be verified , quality criteria is specified as a set of tests. Those tests must ensure the correctness, completeness and security of each service. Software providers must include with each component a complete test plan that covers all the quality criteria. The test plan is composed by:
to verified the .
* Documentation on how to run the tests
* A test suite for each of the generic criteria
* A test suite for each of the specific criteria applicable to the component
* Tests results for all the specified tests
In the case of revision releases, the test plan must include specific tests for the bugs fixed in the release.
= Generic acceptance criteria ==
Services in UMD must include a comprehensive documentation written in a uniform and clear style, which reflects all of the following items:
* Functional description of the software.
* User documentation, including complete man pages of the commands and user guides.
* Complete API documentation (if there is an API)
* Administrator documentation that includes the installation procedure; detailed configuration of service; starting, stopping and querying service procedures; ports (or port ranges) used and expected connections to those ports; cron jobs needed for the service)
* List of processes that are expected to run, giving a typical load of the service. List of how state information is managed and debugging information (e.g.: list of log files, any files or databases containing service information).
* Notes on the testing procedure and expected tests results.
'''Verification''': existence of the documentation with all the required items.
of the the .
=== Source Code Quality and Availability ===
and of each of a that of the the .
The source code of each component of the UMD middleware should follow a coherent and clear programming style that helps in the readability of the code and eases maintenance, testing, debugging, fixing, modification and portability of the software. Open source components must publicly offer their source code and the license with the binaries.
'''Verification''': for Open Source components, availability of the code and license. Source code quality metrics are desirable.
of the .
=== Management, Monitoring, Traceability ===
All the services must include tools related to:
* Starting, stopping, suspending, listing and querying the status of all the service daemons.
* Checking the responsiveness of all the service components or daemons
* Checking the correctness of the service components behavior (expected actions after a request are taken)
* Tracing all the user actions in the system (e.g. by generating logs)
Ideally, these tools should be also available remotely, allowing operators to react timely to problems in the infrastructure. A uniform interface for remote management and monitoring should be followed by all the services.
be the ..
Monitorization should also be easily used in existing monitoring systems such as Nagios.
Test suite with tests to:
* start, stop, suspend, and query status of service
* check responsiveness of service (expected ports open and expected answer to commands received)
* check correctness of service behavior (expexted actions after a request are taken)
* track of user actions in the system (generation of logs and accounting information)
Tools for the automatic or semi- automatic configuration of the services must be provided with the software. These tools should allow the unassisted configuration of the services for the most common use cases while being customizable for advanced user. Complete manual configuration must be always allowed.
'''Verification''': test suite must include the configuration mechanisms and tools. Yaim is considered as the preferred tool.
== Specific acceptance criteria ==
This section will detail the specific acceptance criteria for each of the services that are part of the UMD.
* Computing Services: [[EGI-InSPIRE:UMDQualityCriteria:ComputingServices]]
* Storage Services: [[EGI-InSPIRE:UMDQualityCriteria:StorageServices]]
* Information Services: [[EGI-InSPIRE:UMDQualityCriteria:InformationServices]]
* Data Management Services: [[EGI-InSPIRE:UMDQualityCriteria:DataManagementServices]]
* Workload Management Services: [[EGI-InSPIRE:UMDQualityCriteria:WorkloadManagementServices]]
UMD Quality Criteria
All the software included in the Unified Middleware Distribution (UMD) must meet a set of Quality Criteria defined by EGI. The Quality Criteria can be classified into generic criteria, i.e. criteria which sould hold for any component of the UMD, and specific criteria, i.e. criteria valid for a particular component only.
Any Technology Provider (TP) willing to have their software verified by the SA2 team should carefully read them.
The Quality Criteria (QC) is written following the classification of capabilities defined in can the UMD RoadMap, one document for each type of capability. Take into account that a software component may cover QC specified in more than one of those documents.
QC definition is a continuous process driven by the requirements of users and operations communities, however the verification of new software releases will be done against fixed releases of the QC documents. At least every 6 months a new major version of the QC will be released, although more frequent releases may occur if necessary.
Each new release of the QC will be announced in this page and the TCB mailing list. Along with the announcement of each release of QC specification, a date for its use in verification will be specified. It is expected that verification will use new releases of the QC within 2 to 4 weeks from the release date.
Each QC release will contain documentation with:
- major changes introduced in the version.
- criteria to be deprecated in next release of the QC, if any.
As soon as a major update of the QC is released, the next version will be made available as draft in the DocDB. This draft will allow the TP to plan their testing efforts.
Current QC Specification
Current QC Specification can be found at the QC document in EGI DocDB.
Check the release notes.
||Expected Release Date
||Expected Verification Date
||10. 02. 2011
||10. 02. 2011
|| release notes
||01. 08. 2011
||15. 08. 2011
Past QC releases
There are no past QC releases.