Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "Template:Notes To Contributors"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '===Notes to contributors=== '''Assessment''': (Provide an assessment of the delivery of services over the past year from a managerial perspective; highlight positive areas and ar…')
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Notes to contributors===
== Notes to contributors ==
'''Assessment''': (Provide an assessment of the delivery of services over the past year from a managerial perspective; highlight positive areas and areas for improvement; do not include future plans; text should be roughly 1-2 paragraphs)  
 
 
'''Assessment:''' (Provide an assessment of the delivery of services over the past year from a managerial perspective; highlight positive areas and areas for improvement; do not include future plans; text should be roughly 1-2 paragraphs)
 
'''Score:''' (assign a numerical score from 1 to 5 with a succinct explanation of what needs to be improved to increase your score – remove numerical description references upon completion) 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered


'''Score''': (assign a numerical score from 1 to 5 with a succinct explanation of what needs to be improved to increase your score – remove numerical description references upon completion)
1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement
4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement
5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
<noinclude>
[[Category:Templates]]
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:26, 12 October 2012

Notes to contributors

Assessment: (Provide an assessment of the delivery of services over the past year from a managerial perspective; highlight positive areas and areas for improvement; do not include future plans; text should be roughly 1-2 paragraphs)

Score: (assign a numerical score from 1 to 5 with a succinct explanation of what needs to be improved to increase your score – remove numerical description references upon completion) 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered

2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered

3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered

4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement

5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice