Difference between revisions of "Talk:SiteCertMan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
Is the "site working hours" attribute mandatory? | Is the "site working hours" attribute mandatory? | ||
Is it still necessary to open a GGUS ticket asking for the site to be registered in GGUS? | |||
From what we have seen the sites appear already after a certain time after they have been registered - as candidate. | |||
Eventually expand a bit on: | Eventually expand a bit on: | ||
Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
How long should an initial maintenance downtime last? 2 weeks? Maybe shorter? | How long should an initial maintenance downtime last? 2 weeks? Maybe shorter? | ||
Should the GSTAT requirement be removed? Rather not (Goncalo in response to Alessandro) | Should the GSTAT requirement be removed? Rather not (Goncalo in response to Alessandro) | ||
Expand on how to properly publishing accounting data? | Expand on how to properly publishing accounting data? |
Revision as of 08:26, 8 December 2010
Questions
Site registration procedure
Is the "site working hours" attribute mandatory?
Is it still necessary to open a GGUS ticket asking for the site to be registered in GGUS? From what we have seen the sites appear already after a certain time after they have been registered - as candidate.
Eventually expand a bit on:
How to apply for ops VO?
How to apply for dteam VO?
How to apply for any VO?
Site certification procedure
expand like in https://twiki.cnaf.infn.it/twiki/bin/view/Sandbox/SiteCertification ?
How long should an initial maintenance downtime last? 2 weeks? Maybe shorter?
Should the GSTAT requirement be removed? Rather not (Goncalo in response to Alessandro)
Expand on how to properly publishing accounting data?