Difference between revisions of "TSA2.5 Deployed Middleware Support Unit"

From EGIWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ticket handling procedure)
(Shift schedule)
Line 184: Line 184:
{| style="width: 173px; height: 119px;"
{| style="width: 173px; height: 119px;"
| Oct 10
| Aleš Křenek
| Oct 17
| Alessandro Paolini
| Oct 24
| Zdeněk Salvet
| Oct 31
| Alessandro Paolini
| Nov 7
| Aleš Křenek
| Nov 14
| Sergio Traldi
| Nov 21
| Zdeněk Salvet
| Nov 28
| Sara Bertocco
| Dec 5
| Dec 5
Line 232: Line 209:
| Jan 23
| Jan 23
| Sergio Traldi
| Sergio Traldi
| Jan 30
| Aleš Křenek

Revision as of 17:42, 23 January 2012

TPM cheat sheet

TPM DMSU Cheat Sheet
dCache *
Gridsite *
LB *
MyProxy *
VOMS * *
WMS * *

People working for DMSU

The DMSU people are categorized into two groups:

  • Assigners, i.e. the prime technical contact person pr. partner and also the one to conduct the initial assignment of tickets following the TPM assignment
  • Resolvers, extra experts at each partners to which the assigner can delegate tasks when needed either due to technical reasons or due to overload of one of the other staff members.

The lost of people, with a short list of expertise areas relevant for DMSU follow here:


Assigner: Aleš Křenek, ljocha at ics dot muni dot cz
EGI SSO login: ljocha
Expertise: LB, DPM


  • Zdeněk Salvet, salvet at ics dot muni dot cz (LB, WMS, MyProxy)
  • Zdeněk Šustr, sustr4 at cesnet dot cz (LB, WMS)
  • Daniel Kouřil, kouril at ics dot muni dot cz (Gridsite, MyProxy, VOMS and security in general)


Assigners: Mathilde Romberg (romberg)

Expertise: UNICORE


  • Jason Milad Daivandy


Assigner: Alessandro Paolini (alessandro.paolini at cnaf.infn.it)
EGI SSO login: apaolini
Expertise: CREAM, LFC, VOMS


  • Andrea Cristofori (andrea.cristofori at cnaf.infn.it)(DGAS,WMS)
  • David Rebatto (david.rebatto at mi.infn.it)(CREAM)
  • Sara Bertocco (sara.bertocco at pd.infn.it) (CREAM, WMS)
  • Sergio Traldi (sergio.traldi at pd.infn.it)(CREAM, WMS)
  • Elisabetta Ronchieri (elisabetta.ronchieri at cnaf.infn.it) (STORM)
  • Stefano Dal Pra (stefano.dalpra at cnaf.infn.it)(STORM)
  • Paolo Veronesi (paolo.veronesi at cnaf.infn.it) (BDII, FTS)


Assigner: Emmanouil Paisios
EGI SSO login: epaisios
Expertise: Globus


  • None (Emmanouil is responsible for everything here)


Assigner: Jens Larsson
EGI SSO login: jens
Expertise: ARC, dCache


  • Gerd Behrmann (dCache)
  • Daniel Johansson (ARC)
  • Henrik Thostrup (SGAS, ARC)

Ticket handling procedure

The first mandatory step of DMSU work on a ticket is understanding what is the reason of the reported problem. The outcome of the analysis is documented with the ticket, preferably as a response to the user.

The analysis may or may not include thorough reproduction of the problem; it is left to common sense.

During the analysis DMSU also assesses the priority of the ticket (see bellow) and adjusts Type of problem and Ticket category fields eventually.

DMSU expertise should cover most tickets. For remaining tough issues developers (i.e. the 3rd line support) can be involved. However, the control on the ticket is still kept within DMSU, i.e. the ticket is not reassigned to another support unit.

If solution of the problem does not induce changes in code, documentation, default configuration etc., i.e. release of anything by the technology provider, DMSU closes the ticket.

Otherwise, the ticket is reassigned to the appropriate 3rd line support unit. In this case, the most recent comment (i.e. on reassignment) should contain a brief summary of the DMSU analysis on the ticket, pointing to what is wrong exactly, so that 3rd line supporters don't have to gather all information from the ticket correspondence, which tends to be rather long.

3rd line support can reassign back the ticket if it is a trivial issue that should have been fixed by DMSU. However, this mechanism will be used as a metric of DMSU failures, and checked thoroughly, therefore it should not be abused.

A special case are tickets that were solved in DMSU but they require comment by th 3rd line, i.e. to confirm feasibility of the solution. Those tickets should be closed in DMSU just with a comment indicating the 3rd line was contacted, and the 3rd line approached by other means. The standard GGUS workflow must not be used for this communication, in order to keep the statistics clean, mostly.

Ticket priorities

Followup of tickets with 3rd line support units

DMSU shifts

The main purpose of DMSU shift is no surprise: keep the things running, not to leave an important issue without fast reaction etc.

The shifts are held by groups of people with expertise on different middleware stacks. However, due to the prevailing gLite-related traffic in DMSU only gLite shifts are formally organized currently, the other stacks are handled on the best effort basis.

The specific duties of the person on shift are:

  • to follow incoming emails from GGUS, being able to react within approx. 2 hours in normal working hours
  • to identify "top priority" and "very urgent" issues, not only by the priority set by the submitter but also by using common sense, and to make sure an appropriate expert starts looking into the issue; this includes assigning the ticket to a specific person
  • to keep checking that there is reasonable response time, namely as a reaction to further submitter's correspondence; it should be almost immediate on "top priority", and we can probably afford upto 1 week for "less urgent"

One person holds the shift for one week, the duty is passed to the other on Monday afternoon.

Shift schedule

Dec 5 Zdeněk Salvet
Dec 12 INFN
Dec 19 Aleš Křenek
Dec 26 best effort
Jan 2 Aleš Křenek
Jan 9 Alessandro Paolini
Jan 16 Zdeněk Salvet
Jan 23 Sergio Traldi
Jan 30 Aleš Křenek

DMSU Digests

Brief description and indexing of issues solved within DMSU that are likely to have broader impact on EGI Operations.

Maintained on separate page Middleware_issues_and_solutions

Operations Documentation

DMSU contributes to maintenance of EGI Operations_Manuals, in particular

Systems available for DMSU

In order to debug issues and design workaround availability to some systems is needed. Below is a list of systems available for the DMSU staff pr partner.



  • # nodes/cores: 20/80
  • OS: SL 5.2
  • Batch system: PBSPro
  • Grid m/w: gLite 3.1
  • EA Site: Y



Virtual machines for experimental services, can be scratched and reinstalled as required.

  • # nodes/cores: 2/2
  • OS: SL 5.3 x86_64
  • Batch system: N/A
  • Scheduler: N/A
  • Grid m/w and flavour: LB 2.0 (of gLite 3.2)
  • EA Site: N



# nodes/cores: a) 4/8 b) 3/6
OS: a) SL4 x86_32 b) SL5 x86_64
Batch system: torque/pbs
Scheduler: maui
Grid m/w and flavour: a) INFNGRID 3.1 (based on gLite 3.1) b) INFNGRID 3.2 (based on gLite 3.2)
EA Site: Y (for STORM service) https://goc.gridops.org/site/list?id=95


Linux Cluster

   * Nodes/Cores: 938/5532
   * OS: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10
   * Batch System/Scheduler: SGE 6.2
   * Globus 4.0.7
   * EA Site: N



   * Nodes/Cores: 66/528
   * CentOS 5.7
   * Torque (to be replaced by SLURM)
   * MOAB (to be replaced by SLURM)
   * ARC 1.1
   * EA Site
   * https://goc.gridops.org/node/list?id=7055071

Obsolete stuff

Not used anymore but keeping the old links here.

Relevant tickets

Relevant tickets passed through DMSU and assigned to other support units are gathered here