Difference between revisions of "TCB:Members"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== TCB Members == | == TCB Members == | ||
The membership of the group is not fixed – in particular the representation from the technology providers will vary over time as the technology used within the production infrastructure changes. There are two criteria relating to the selection of technology provider: | The membership of the group is not fixed – in particular the representation from the technology providers will vary over time as the technology used within the production infrastructure changes. There are two criteria relating to the selection of technology provider: | ||
* They must have an established collaborative relationship with EGI. This is generally expressed in a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) | |||
* They are delivering, or have agreed to deliver, components into the EGI Technology Roadmap (software which may enter UMD). This will have been specified in a Service Level Agreement (SLA) | |||
Each voting member is entitled to nominate a deputy. A deputy can only vote if the full member is not available | Each voting member is entitled to nominate a deputy. A deputy can only vote if the full member is not available |
Revision as of 11:51, 14 October 2010
TCB Members
The membership of the group is not fixed – in particular the representation from the technology providers will vary over time as the technology used within the production infrastructure changes. There are two criteria relating to the selection of technology provider:
- They must have an established collaborative relationship with EGI. This is generally expressed in a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)
- They are delivering, or have agreed to deliver, components into the EGI Technology Roadmap (software which may enter UMD). This will have been specified in a Service Level Agreement (SLA)
Each voting member is entitled to nominate a deputy. A deputy can only vote if the full member is not available