Difference between revisions of "NGI International Task Review MS124 Switzerland"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{MS124 <!-- NGI International Tasks Review --> | NGIInternationalLiaison_Assessment = your assessment here | NGIInternationalLiaison_Score = 0-5 | NGIInternationalLiaison_How...") |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- NGI International Tasks Review --> | <!-- NGI International Tasks Review --> | ||
| Marketing_Assessment = your assessment here | |||
| Marketing_Score = 0-5 | |||
| Marketing_HowToImprove = how to improve | |||
| Marketing_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_Assessment = Average | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_Score = 3 | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_HowToImprove = Focus on fewer key communities and adapt the infrastructure to met their requirements | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Will probably remain at national level (and more importantly, organised at national level) | |||
| | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_Assessment = Average | ||
| | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_Score = 3 | ||
| | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_HowToImprove = Have more focused activities with clear objectives aimed to extend the infrastructure to to better serve the key communities targeted by NA2.1 | ||
| DistributedCompetencyCentre_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Will continue those activities that have a national impact | |||
| | | NGIActivityManagement_Assessment = Overall good | ||
| | | NGIActivityManagement_Score = 4 | ||
| | | NGIActivityManagement_HowToImprove = Funding concerns often dominate the management activities; no simple solution for that | ||
| NGIActivityManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Less focus on central operation/services | |||
| | | ASecureInfrastructure_Assessment = Overall good, but difficult to guarantee x509 user certs + site security. Still ok given the low criticality of the infrastructure (as it is perceived from the outside?) | ||
| | | ASecureInfrastructure_Score = 3 | ||
| | | ASecureInfrastructure_HowToImprove = In the long term reduce x509 necessity? | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Move security procedures to VOs/local teams within the NGIs | |||
| | | ServiceDeployment _Assessment = Often important updates are delayed into UMD -> the repository might not be used after the end of the project. The Documentation is VERY POOR + yaim is going to bedeprecated (MAJOR problem) | ||
| | | ServiceDeployment_Score = 2 | ||
| | | ServiceDeployment_HowToImprove = simplify repository structure if possible, follow Linux distros procedures when possible. | ||
| ServiceDeployment_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = several repo from the software providers, involve non HEP VOs for maintenance (difficult)-> cloud/VM templates better for certain use cases | |||
| | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_Assessment = Overall good, as mostly based on WLCG | ||
| | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_Score = 4 | ||
| | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_HowToImprove = involve non HEP VOs -> cloud solutions. | ||
| nfrastructureforGridManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Expand cloud solutions for non HEP users (from hep centered to non HEP centered?) | |||
| | | Accounting_Assessment = ARC accounting is still not fully integrated. | ||
| | | Accounting_Score = 3 | ||
| | | Accounting_HowToImprove = | ||
| Accounting_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Difficult to maintain/improve after the end of the project | |||
| HelpdeskInfrastructure_Assessment = Overall good. The required effort seems however fairly high | |||
| HelpdeskInfrastructure_Score = 4 | |||
| HelpdeskInfrastructure_HowToImprove = Render more efficient (less manpower required) and involve non HEP VOs if possible | |||
| HelpdeskInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Difficult to maintain/improve after the end of the project-> VOs should take over this effort (non HEP VOs will face major problems) | |||
| SupportTeams_Assessment = Overall good, but difficult to maintain after the end of the project | |||
| SupportTeams_Score = 4 | |||
| SupportTeams_HowToImprove = Allow 1 to 1 interaction (via chat/phone) with sys admins/users, when needed. | |||
| SupportTeams_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = move this effort to the VOs when possible. Non HEP VOs will face major problems. | |||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Assessment = Overall good, but mostly because based on WLCG, which also provides some internal monitoring and quality assurance | |||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Score = 5 | |||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_HowToImprove = Better and more efficient monitoring | |||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = move monitoring to VOs, drop some unnecessary tasks | |||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Metrics]] | [[Category:Metrics]] |