Difference between revisions of "NGI International Task Review MS124 Switzerland"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- NGI International Tasks Review --> | <!-- NGI International Tasks Review --> | ||
| Marketing_Assessment = your assessment here | |||
| Marketing_Score = 0-5 | |||
| Marketing_HowToImprove = how to improve | |||
| Marketing_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_Assessment = | | NGIInternationalLiaison_Assessment = Average | ||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_Score = | | NGIInternationalLiaison_Score = 3 | ||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_HowToImprove = | | NGIInternationalLiaison_HowToImprove = Focus on fewer key communities and adapt the infrastructure to met their requirements | ||
| | | NGIInternationalLiaison_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Will probably remain at national level (and more importantly, organised at national level) | ||
| DistributedCompetencyCentre_Assessment = | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_Assessment = Average | ||
| DistributedCompetencyCentre_Score = | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_Score = 3 | ||
| DistributedCompetencyCentre_HowToImprove = | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_HowToImprove = Have more focused activities with clear objectives aimed to extend the infrastructure to to better serve the key communities targeted by NA2.1 | ||
| DistributedCompetencyCentre_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Will continue those activities that have a national impact | ||
| NGIActivityManagement_Assessment = Overall good | | NGIActivityManagement_Assessment = Overall good | ||
Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
| NGIActivityManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Less focus on central operation/services | | NGIActivityManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Less focus on central operation/services | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_Assessment = | | ASecureInfrastructure_Assessment = Overall good, but difficult to guarantee x509 user certs + site security. Still ok given the low criticality of the infrastructure (as it is perceived from the outside?) | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_Score = | | ASecureInfrastructure_Score = 3 | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_HowToImprove = | | ASecureInfrastructure_HowToImprove = In the long term reduce x509 necessity? | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | | ASecureInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Move security procedures to VOs/local teams within the NGIs | ||
| ServiceDeployment _Assessment = Often important updates are delayed into UMD -> the repository might not be used after the end of the project. The Documentation is VERY POOR + yaim is going to bedeprecated (MAJOR problem) | | ServiceDeployment _Assessment = Often important updates are delayed into UMD -> the repository might not be used after the end of the project. The Documentation is VERY POOR + yaim is going to bedeprecated (MAJOR problem) | ||
| ServiceDeployment_Score = 2 | | ServiceDeployment_Score = 2 | ||
| ServiceDeployment_HowToImprove = simplify repository structure if possible, follow Linux distros procedures when possible. | | ServiceDeployment_HowToImprove = simplify repository structure if possible, follow Linux distros procedures when possible. | ||
| ServiceDeployment_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = several repo from the software providers, involve non HEP VOs for maintenance (difficult)-> cloud/VM templates better for certain use cases | | ServiceDeployment_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = several repo from the software providers, involve non HEP VOs for maintenance (difficult)-> cloud/VM templates better for certain use cases | ||
| InfrastructureforGridManagement_Assessment = Overall good, as mostly based on WLCG | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_Assessment = Overall good, as mostly based on WLCG | ||
| InfrastructureforGridManagement_Score = 4 | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_Score = 4 | ||
| InfrastructureforGridManagement_HowToImprove = involve non HEP VOs -> cloud solutions. | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_HowToImprove = involve non HEP VOs -> cloud solutions. | ||
| nfrastructureforGridManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | | nfrastructureforGridManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Expand cloud solutions for non HEP users (from hep centered to non HEP centered?) | ||
| Accounting_Assessment = ARC accounting is still not fully integrated. | | Accounting_Assessment = ARC accounting is still not fully integrated. | ||
Line 48: | Line 52: | ||
| SupportTeams_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = move this effort to the VOs when possible. Non HEP VOs will face major problems. | | SupportTeams_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = move this effort to the VOs when possible. Non HEP VOs will face major problems. | ||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Assessment = Overall good, but mostly because based on WLCG | | ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Assessment = Overall good, but mostly because based on WLCG, which also provides some internal monitoring and quality assurance | ||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Score = 5 | | ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Score = 5 | ||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_HowToImprove = | | ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_HowToImprove = Better and more efficient monitoring | ||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | | ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = move monitoring to VOs, drop some unnecessary tasks | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Metrics]] | [[Category:Metrics]] |