Difference between revisions of "NGI International Task Review MS124 Switzerland"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| NGIActivityManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Less focus on central operation/services | | NGIActivityManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Less focus on central operation/services | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_Assessment = | | ASecureInfrastructure_Assessment = Overall good, but difficult to guarantee x509 user certs + site security. Still ok given the low criticality of the infrastructure (as it is perceived from the outside?) | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_Score = | | ASecureInfrastructure_Score = 3 | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_HowToImprove = | | ASecureInfrastructure_HowToImprove = In the long term reduce x509 necessity? | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | | ASecureInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Move security procedures to VOs/local teams within the NGIs | ||
| ServiceDeployment _Assessment = Often important updates are delayed into UMD -> the repository might not be used after the end of the project. The Documentation is VERY POOR + yaim is going to bedeprecated (MAJOR problem) | | ServiceDeployment _Assessment = Often important updates are delayed into UMD -> the repository might not be used after the end of the project. The Documentation is VERY POOR + yaim is going to bedeprecated (MAJOR problem) |