The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.
NGI International Task Review MS124 Portugal
In the table below, you should provide your self-assessment for the EGI-InSPIRE "NGI International Tasks" for milestone MS124 "NGI International Tasks Review"
For more information on how to complete the tables, read the dedicated Instructions Page
Notes:
- This milestone is an assessment of services from a managerial perspective and should be reported as an evaluation of the services (e.g. objectives being met; resources to effort; issues; suggested strategic changes).
- 'DO NOT' report what your NGI did for those tasks/services as this is covered by the Quarterly Reports.
- In order to edit this page, you need to log in with your EGI SSO account and click 'edit' on the tab (top of this page).
Community Engagement
| EGI-InSPIRE Task | Task Name | Assessment | Score | How to Improve | After EGI-InSPIRE** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *NA2U.2E | Marketing |
There seems to be a considerable and important effort on communication and dissimination. In response to the critics from last review, the web pages have been enhanced and are now much better with a higher focus on the general public. The communication within the project is also in good shape with the regular newsletters, the NIL dispatch and the director's letters. However, it is difficult to assess the impact outside of the project. | 4 | how to improve | |
| NA2.1N | NGI International Liaison |
I think the NIL role doesn't achieved its objectives. Although the funding is available for this role, it has been deviated from other tasks, that have to be delivered anyhow, and most of the times by the same persons. In general, this is an extra role faced as an extra burden, and therefore, it is difficult to motivate people to perform their duties either efficiently or in a timely manner. I wonder how is the response from all NILs in a general way. My impression is that these are people deeply involved in many fundamental tasks of the project, and therefore, do not have the time or the will to handle this extra load. | 2 | how to improve | |
| NA2.6N | Distributed Competency Centre |
your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve |
*Please provide your external assessment on the quality of the service, which is delivered as a Global Task (scores and feedback will be included as part of MS123 - Global Task Review).
**Please comment on the continuation or service impact at the end of EC funding regarding the EGI-InSPIRE task/service.
Operations
| EGI-InSPIRE Task | Task Name | Assessment | Score | How to Improve | After EGI-InSPIRE** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA1.1N | NGI Activity Management | your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve | |
| SA1.2N | A Secure Infrastructure | your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve | |
| SA1.3N | Service Deployment | your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve | |
| SA1.4N | Infrastructure for Grid Management | your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve | |
| SA1.5N | Accounting | your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve | |
| SA1.6N | Helpdesk Infrastructure | your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve | |
| SA1.7N | Support Teams | your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve | |
| SA1.8N | Providing a Reliable Grid Infrastructure | your assessment here | 0-5 | how to improve |
**Please comment on the continuation or service impact at the end of EC funding regarding the EGI-InSPIRE task/service. If you have no information you can leave this column blank.