Difference between revisions of "NGI International Task Review MS124 Portugal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_Score = 3 | | NGIInternationalLiaison_Score = 3 | ||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_HowToImprove = The current model should be re-evaluated taking into account previous considerations. | | NGIInternationalLiaison_HowToImprove = The current model should be re-evaluated taking into account previous considerations. | ||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | | NGIInternationalLiaison_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = The NIL model is not sustainable and does not fit well the structure and effort of all NGIs especially the smaller ones. Another model is needed. | ||
| DistributedCompetencyCentre_Assessment = NGI staff has actively contributed to major activities which consumed a considerable amount of effort (ex: MPI VT and others). However, due to lack of central coordination after the end of the VT work, the VTs work may be lost. The work performed by the VTs is not properly broadcasted. The goals or achievements are not easily consulted. Moreover, once the VT ends, and if the VT work requires some follow up by other project tasks, there is no coordination in place that can reassess the progress status and check if the VT work was in vain or not. | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_Assessment = NGI staff has actively contributed to major activities which consumed a considerable amount of effort (ex: MPI VT and others). However, due to lack of central coordination after the end of the VT work, the VTs work may be lost. The work performed by the VTs is not properly broadcasted. The goals or achievements are not easily consulted. Moreover, once the VT ends, and if the VT work requires some follow up by other project tasks, there is no coordination in place that can reassess the progress status and check if the VT work was in vain or not. | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| ServiceDeployment_Score = 4 | | ServiceDeployment_Score = 4 | ||
| ServiceDeployment_HowToImprove = Involve more partners in the stage rollout of middleware products, especially during major releases of critical components | | ServiceDeployment_HowToImprove = Involve more partners in the stage rollout of middleware products, especially during major releases of critical components | ||
| ServiceDeployment_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = A coordinated effort on how to deploy middleware in the production infrastructure is extremely important with the end of the EMI project | | ServiceDeployment_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = A coordinated effort on how to deploy middleware in the production infrastructure is extremely important especially with the end of the EMI project. | ||
| InfrastructureforGridManagement_Assessment = Major effort is committed in the deployment of critical services and tools. Experts are proactive and there is a regular follow up of problems and issues with site performance. | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_Assessment = Major effort is committed in the deployment of critical services and tools. Experts are proactive and there is a regular follow up of problems and issues with site performance. | ||
| InfrastructureforGridManagement_Score = 4 | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_Score = 4 | ||
| InfrastructureforGridManagement_HowToImprove = Increase the expertise for the most critical services within the region. Enhance or extend fault-tolerance and high availability mechanisms. | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_HowToImprove = Increase the expertise for the most critical services within the region. Enhance or extend fault-tolerance and high availability mechanisms. | ||
| nfrastructureforGridManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Core activity for operations. | | nfrastructureforGridManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Core activity for operations. Must continue to be funded. | ||
| Accounting_Assessment = Follow up of accounting problems. Given the size of the infrastructure and the jointly operation with Spain, the current effort is sufficient to guarantee that usage is correctly accounted | | Accounting_Assessment = Follow up of accounting problems. Given the size of the infrastructure and the jointly operation with Spain, the current effort is sufficient to guarantee that usage is correctly accounted | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Score = 4 | | ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Score = 4 | ||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_HowToImprove = A better and more proactive support can only be obtained with more human resources. | | ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_HowToImprove = A better and more proactive support can only be obtained with more human resources. | ||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | | ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = If operations funding is cut after EGI-Inspire the reliability of the infrastructure will be affected | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Metrics]] | [[Category:Metrics]] |