Difference between revisions of "NGI International Task Review MS124 Italy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{MS124 <!-- NGI International Tasks Review --> | NGIInternationalLiaison_Assessment = your assessment here | NGIInternationalLiaison_Score = 0-5 | NGIInternationalLiaison_How...") |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- NGI International Tasks Review --> | <!-- NGI International Tasks Review --> | ||
| Marketing_Assessment = The website and the communications channel (wikis, twitter etc..) improved a lot. The EGI Champion scheme could also help, but it's too early for an assessment. | |||
| Marketing_Score = 4 | |||
| Marketing_HowToImprove = Make more visible the activities of the Champions and marketing activities within the NGIs through dedicated newsletter similar to the one used for NILs communication, but dedicated to marketing. | |||
| Marketing_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_Assessment = The NIL is a good concept and is importand to improve the knowledge sharing and the building of the "social network" EGI needs. VTs are also an imprtant activity for the same objectives. | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_Score = 4 | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_HowToImprove = NILs should meet more often that just at the Forums. Maybe a good timing is every quarter after having filled the quarterly report, so that main NGI activities can be reported to the others and cross-chekced with the information entered in the CRM and AppDB. Concerning the VTs maybe we should start a phase of more technical, now most of them where focused on community building a requirements definition. | |||
| NGIInternationalLiaison_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = This activity is important to be continued after InSPIRE | |||
| | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_Assessment = This is an important activity and we think that many communities in Italy had benifit from it. Dedicated consultancy is more effective than general purpose training but need a lot of effort. | ||
| | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_Score = 4 | ||
| | | DistributedCompetencyCentre_HowToImprove = Effort to this activity should be increased | ||
| DistributedCompetencyCentre_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = This activity is important to be continued after InSPIRE | |||
| | | NGIActivityManagement_Assessment = Regular meetings and workshop are effective and useful to coordinate the overall activity across the NGIs | ||
| | | NGIActivityManagement_Score = 5 | ||
| | | NGIActivityManagement_HowToImprove = | ||
| NGIActivityManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = This activity is very important to be continued after InSPIRE in order to maintain a distributed E-infrastructure | |||
| | | ASecureInfrastructure_Assessment = Very valuables work in particular concerning the security monitoring and the support to the sites in case of security incident. | ||
| | | ASecureInfrastructure_Score = 4 | ||
| | | ASecureInfrastructure_HowToImprove = The security alerts and vulnerabilities assessment should be a little bit improved. | ||
| ASecureInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = This activity is very important to be continued after InSPIRE in order to maintain a distributed E-infrastructure | |||
| | | ServiceDeployment _Assessment = Staged rollout is a very important process and a real added value for EGI Communities. | ||
| | | ServiceDeployment_Score = 4 | ||
| | | ServiceDeployment_HowToImprove = Faster rollout, more early adopters. | ||
| ServiceDeployment_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = The coordination of the SR should be continued after InSPIRE in order to maintain a distributed E-infrastructure | |||
| | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_Assessment = Lots of core Grid services are provided in a reliable infrastructure | ||
| | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_Score = 4 | ||
| | | InfrastructureforGridManagement_HowToImprove = automate the provisioning of core Grid service using a IaaS infrastructure. Better distribution of core services in order to optimize the management effort | ||
| nfrastructureforGridManagement_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = It is important to assess the number of core services needed in the whole infrastructure in order to optimize the management effort and minimize the costs. | |||
| | | Accounting_Assessment = sites started to publish UserDNs; there are some lacks about storage and cloud metrics | ||
| | | Accounting_Score = 3 | ||
| | | Accounting_HowToImprove = adding new metrics (cloud, network, storage). Web portal improved, but still not so user friendly | ||
| Accounting_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = Central accounting is very important in order to maintain a distributed E-infrastructure | |||
| HelpdeskInfrastructure_Assessment = The architecture of the helpdesk infrastructure based on a central instance (GGUS) and regional (and often completed independent) instances is very good. | |||
| HelpdeskInfrastructure_Score = 5 | |||
| HelpdeskInfrastructure_HowToImprove = | |||
| HelpdeskInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = At least the central support instance (GGUS) is needed in order to efficiently support the overall infrastructure. | |||
| SupportTeams_Assessment = The support is overall good, support people are regularly trained, good documentation available | |||
| SupportTeams_Score = 5 | |||
| SupportTeams_HowToImprove = | |||
| SupportTeams_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = The distributed support model is very important for the whole infrastructure. Non HEP VOs will face major problems. | |||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Assessment = sites availability is monitored and their performance are very good | |||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_Score = 4 | |||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_HowToImprove = Users are not aware of failing instances (instances were SAM test are failing). Information about these failure should be available to the users | |||
| ProvidingaReliableGridInfrastructure_AfterEGI-InSPIRE = This activity is very important to be continued after InSPIRE in order to maintain a distributed E-infrastructure | |||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Metrics]] | [[Category:Metrics]] |