Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "NGI International Task Review MS109 Latvia"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{NGI_InternationalTask_Review <!-- User Services - Human Services --> | US_HS_RequirementsGathering_Assessment = write here | US_HS_RequirementsGathering_Score = 0-5 | US_HS_R…')
 
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- User Services - Human Services -->
<!-- User Services - Human Services -->


| US_HS_RequirementsGathering_Assessment = write here
| US_HS_RequirementsGathering_Assessment = There is no structured or formally operational system for gathering and processing requirements of a local scale and there is no plans to deploy it by own means. Due to relatively small research community as a whole, requirements of user communities are gathered during contacts with local communities and evaluated on individual basis. Formal local system would not be sustainable considering small amount of research groups and necessary operational effort overhead. So far the required features for some user communities were approved and implemented in few selected Latvian NGI sites only.
| US_HS_RequirementsGathering_Score = 0-5
| US_HS_RequirementsGathering_Score = 3
| US_HS_RequirementsGathering_HowToImprove = write here
| US_HS_RequirementsGathering_HowToImprove = Global requirements submission and processing system could be usefull, especially one allowing to exchange requirements experience between similas user communities in different NGIs.


| US_HS_Application_Database_Assessment = write here
| US_HS_Application_Database_Assessment = Currently most usr communities in Latvian NGI use either their own custom-tailored experiment-specific software, which does not provide reasonable re-usability for other communities, or licensed commercial software like ANSYS, Matlab or GAMESS is run using the licenses available to specific communities, thus these software packages cannot be exported as well. In case some generic open-souce software will be used in the future by some research community, it will be exported to AppDB.
| US_HS_Application_Database_Score = 0-5
| US_HS_Application_Database_Score = 2
| US_HS_Application_Database_HowToImprove = write here
| US_HS_Application_Database_HowToImprove = More effort is necessary to try and migrate several user communities from commercial or own custom-written software to generic reusable open-source packages from AppDB.


| US_HS_Training_Assessment = write here
| US_HS_Training_Assessment = Trainings are organised on request by individual user comunities. No e-trainings are available. No scheduled trainings are planned.
| US_HS_Training_Score = 0-5
| US_HS_Training_Score = 3
| US_HS_Training_HowToImprove = write here
| US_HS_Training_HowToImprove = Migration of several sites to desktop-grid compatible ARC/Condor middleware is expected within PQ4 to significantly improve amount of available automated tools for user communities.


| US_HS_Consultancy_Assessment = write here
| US_HS_Consultancy_Assessment = Due to small number of research communities, highly interactive consultancy is provided to these communities. Mainly consultancy, similarly as training, is provided through local meetings, phone conferences and Instant Messaging (Skype or Jabber). In case none of previous are available, a slower approach of using problem-specific or general grid user mailing lists is employed.
| US_HS_Consultancy_Score = 0-5
| US_HS_Consultancy_Score = 4
| US_HS_Consultancy_HowToImprove = write here
| US_HS_Consultancy_HowToImprove = In the future a possible online archive (FAQ or forum) would be usefull for new users who stumble across previously discussed problems. Ideally, such local user support/consultancy resource should be hosted in local language.


<!-- Operations Services - Human Services -->
<!-- Operations Services - Human Services -->

Revision as of 15:45, 4 March 2011



This page contains the assessment of the NGI International Task at year 1 of the EGI-InSPIRE project (one page per NGI). The NGI representatives are required to fill the tables according to the required information. The content will be integral part of the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS109 "NGI International Task Review"

  • Main page with instructions
  • In order to edit this page, you need to log in with your EGI SSO account and click 'edit' on the tab (top of this page)

User Services

Human Services (Table 1)

Table 1: NGI Assessment: User Services >> Human Services
EGI-InSPIRE EGI_DS Name Assessment Score How to Improve
NA3.3N U-N-3 U-N-13 Requirements Gathering There is no structured or formally operational system for gathering and processing requirements of a local scale and there is no plans to deploy it by own means. Due to relatively small research community as a whole, requirements of user communities are gathered during contacts with local communities and evaluated on individual basis. Formal local system would not be sustainable considering small amount of research groups and necessary operational effort overhead. So far the required features for some user communities were approved and implemented in few selected Latvian NGI sites only. 3 Global requirements submission and processing system could be usefull, especially one allowing to exchange requirements experience between similas user communities in different NGIs.
NA3.3N U-N-14 U-N-15 Application Database Currently most usr communities in Latvian NGI use either their own custom-tailored experiment-specific software, which does not provide reasonable re-usability for other communities, or licensed commercial software like ANSYS, Matlab or GAMESS is run using the licenses available to specific communities, thus these software packages cannot be exported as well. In case some generic open-souce software will be used in the future by some research community, it will be exported to AppDB. 2 More effort is necessary to try and migrate several user communities from commercial or own custom-written software to generic reusable open-source packages from AppDB.
NA3.3N U-N-16 U-N-17 Training Trainings are organised on request by individual user comunities. No e-trainings are available. No scheduled trainings are planned. 3 Migration of several sites to desktop-grid compatible ARC/Condor middleware is expected within PQ4 to significantly improve amount of available automated tools for user communities.
NA3.3N U-N-12 U-N-18 U-N-19 Consultancy Due to small number of research communities, highly interactive consultancy is provided to these communities. Mainly consultancy, similarly as training, is provided through local meetings, phone conferences and Instant Messaging (Skype or Jabber). In case none of previous are available, a slower approach of using problem-specific or general grid user mailing lists is employed. 4 In the future a possible online archive (FAQ or forum) would be usefull for new users who stumble across previously discussed problems. Ideally, such local user support/consultancy resource should be hosted in local language.

Operations Services

Human Services (Table 2)

Table 2: NGI Assessment: Operations Services >> Human Services
EGI-InSPIRE EGI_DS Name Assessment Score How to Improve
SA1.4N O-N-9 Requirements Gathering your assessment here 0-5 how to improve
SA1.1N O-N-9 Operations Coordination write here 0-5 write here
SA1.2N O-N-9 Security write here 0-5 write here

Infrastructure Services (Table 3)

Table 3: NGI Assessment: Operations Services >> Infrastructure Services
EGI-InSPIRE EGI_DS Name Assessment Score How to Improve
SA1.3N O-N-9 Software Rollout write here 0-5 write here
SA1.4N O-N-3 Monitoring write here 0-5 write here
SA1.5N O-N-2 Accounting write here 0-5 write here
SA1.4N O-N-1 O-N-4 Configuration Repository and Operations Portal write here 0-5 write here
SA1.6N SA1.7N O-N-6 O-N-7 Helpdesk write here 0-5 write here
SA1.8N O-N-5 O-N-8 Core Services write here 0-5 write here

Other (Table 4)

Table 4: NGI Assessment: Other
EGI-InSPIRE EGI_DS Name Assessment Score How to Improve
NA2.3N Policy Development write here 0-5 write here
NA2.2N E-N-2 Dissemination write here 0-5 write here