Difference between revisions of "Milestone review procedure"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| '''Time before submission''' || '''State in AMB RT Queue''' || '''RT Ticket Owner''' || '''Material'''|| | | '''Time before submission''' || '''State in AMB RT Queue''' || '''RT Ticket Owner''' || '''Material'''|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 6 weeks || ToC || ||Document skeleton created and first version of the document with the table of contents entered into the document. | | 6 weeks || ToC || Activity Manager ||Document skeleton created and first version of the document with the table of contents entered into the document. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 4 weeks || Draft || ||A full draft is available in the repository that has been reviewed within the activity. | | 4 weeks || Draft || Activity Manager ||A full draft is available in the repository that has been reviewed within the activity. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2 weeks || Review || ||A review led by a moderator and one reviewer using the document comments form has been completed and responded to by the document authors. This may take multiple cycles. | | 2 weeks || Review || Review Moderator ||A review led by a moderator and one reviewer using the document comments form has been completed and responded to by the document authors. This may take multiple cycles. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2 weeks || AMB Review || ||Document starts being reviewed by the AMB. | | 2 weeks || AMB Review || Project Manager ||Document starts being reviewed by the AMB. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1 week || PMB Review|| ||Document starts being reviewed by the PMB. | | 1 week || PMB Review|| Project Director ||Document starts being reviewed by the PMB. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Deadline || With EC|| ||A clean version of the document is in the document repository. | |Deadline || With EC|| Project Finance Officer ||A clean version of the document is in the document repository. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
The review is led by a member of the AMB from an activity that is '''not''' producing the document. One reviewer is drawn from the function of EGI (i.e. Operations, User Community, Technology or Policy) that is identified as a consumer of the work that is not involved in its production. | The review is led by a member of the AMB from an activity that is '''not''' producing the document. One reviewer is drawn from the function of EGI (i.e. Operations, User Community, Technology or Policy) that is identified as a consumer of the work that is not involved in its production. |
Revision as of 13:30, 1 September 2010
The formal outputs from the project (milestones and deliverables) will pass through a formal review process. The review process is timed to ensure the output is available to the EC at the end of the project month (PM) that the material is due. Deliverable and milestone review forms are available from https://documents.egi.eu/document/54.
Time before submission | State in AMB RT Queue | RT Ticket Owner | Material | |
6 weeks | ToC | Activity Manager | Document skeleton created and first version of the document with the table of contents entered into the document. | |
4 weeks | Draft | Activity Manager | A full draft is available in the repository that has been reviewed within the activity. | |
2 weeks | Review | Review Moderator | A review led by a moderator and one reviewer using the document comments form has been completed and responded to by the document authors. This may take multiple cycles. | |
2 weeks | AMB Review | Project Manager | Document starts being reviewed by the AMB. | |
1 week | PMB Review | Project Director | Document starts being reviewed by the PMB. | |
Deadline | With EC | Project Finance Officer | A clean version of the document is in the document repository. |
The review is led by a member of the AMB from an activity that is not producing the document. One reviewer is drawn from the function of EGI (i.e. Operations, User Community, Technology or Policy) that is identified as a consumer of the work that is not involved in its production.