Difference between revisions of "IPv6TestReports"

From EGIWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Testing reports)
(Test Results)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
{| class="wikitable sortable collapsible collapsed" "style="background:#cccc99;color:black;width:80%;" border="1";cellpadding="5";cellspacing="0";align="center"
 
{| class="wikitable sortable collapsible collapsed" "style="background:#cccc99;color:black;width:80%;" border="1";cellpadding="5";cellspacing="0";align="center"
! Dist !! Fam !! Service !! Exact Ref !! 0) Did switching on IPv6 break anything ?  1) Was IPv6-only install<br> possible? !! 2) Was IPv6-only config<br>  possible ? !! 3) Smoke: Did all daemons start  <br> properly  ?!! 4) Basic Functionality provided in IPv6-only ? !! 5) Stress Tested using IPv6 ? !! class="unsortable"| 6) Ref Doc. !! Tester  
+
! Dist !! Fam !! Service !! Exact Ref !! 0) Did switching on IPv6 break anything ? !! 1) Was IPv6-only install<br> possible? !! 2) Was IPv6-only config<br>  possible ? !! 3) Smoke: Did all daemons start  <br> properly  ?!! 4) Basic Functionality provided in IPv6-only ? !! 5) Stress Tested using IPv6 ? !! class="unsortable"| 6) Ref Doc. !! Tester  
  
 
|- style="background:white; color:black"
 
|- style="background:white; color:black"

Revision as of 16:08, 4 June 2012

Testing reports

We gather here all test reports about UMD Components, spanning different test domains:


0. Dual Stack : Did switching on the IPv6 stack break anything ?

1. Installation : Has it been possible to install the service using only IPv6 ?
2. Configuration: Was configuration possible using only IPv6 ?
3. Smoke testing : was is possible to start the services properly using only IPv6 ?
4. Basic Functional Tests: Was the expected basic functionality correctly provided ?
5. Has the system been stressed using IPv6-only ?


Test Results