Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "IPv6"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 202: Line 202:
| '''Finland'''
| '''Finland'''
| '''CSC/Funet'''
| '''CSC/Funet'''
|  
| NO
|
| YES
|  
| YES, where available
|
|
|
| YES
|
| Testing and futureproofing 
|
| YES
|
| YES
|
| YES
|
| NO
|  
|  
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black"
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black"

Revision as of 16:32, 15 September 2011

EGI IPv6 related activities and survey

caption


IPv6 Tools and Links / Guides

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EGEE/IPv6FollowUp EGEE III SA2 IPv6 Follow Up pages

IPv6 Survey

https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/File:IPv6_Questionnaire_for_NGIs-v1.0.pdf

IPv6 Survey Result


# Short Country NGI 1) Any
IPv6-only site?
2) IPv6 sites
today ?
3) IPv6 sites
planned ?
4) How many sites
with IPv6 connect?
5)NREN IPv6? 6)Motivation
for IPv6
7)Tutorials
IPv6 ?
8)Tutorials IPv6
security ?
9) Testbed? 10) Task
Force?
other info
or comments
1. AL Albania ALBGRID ... ...
2. AM Armenia ANGI ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
3. AT Austria AustrianGrid ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
4. BY Belarus BNGI ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
5. BE Belgium BEgrid ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
6. BA Bosnia-Herzegovina NGI_BA YES NO YES, NEXT 6 MONTHS (ROUGHLY) 2 YES/NO (2 RENs) Lack of IPv4 addresses YES YES YES (IN 6 MOTHS TIME) NO ...
7. BG Bulgaria BGI ... ...
8. HR Croatia CRO NGI NO NO NO All YES To take advantage of IPv6 protocol specific fetures
To promote IPv6 services
YES YES NO NO
9. CY Cyprus CGI NO NO NO 0 NO YES NO NO NO ...
10. CZ Czech Republic MetaCentrum
11. DK Denmark <TBA> ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
12. FI Finland CSC/Funet NO YES YES, where available 1 YES Testing and futureproofing YES YES YES NO
13. FR France IDG/FranceGrille
14. GE Georgia GEO-GRID NO NO NO (Not Yet) 0 NO NO YES YES NO NO ...
15. DE Germany NGI-DE
16. GR Greece GRNET/Hellasgrid NO NO NO NO YES NO NO YES NO
17. HU Hungary MGKK ...
18. IE Ireland GridIreland NO YES - Not a Grid Site level, but at Institute level. 5 of our 6 grid connected sites support IPv6 NO 5 YES Technological advantages YES YES – In particular Ipv6 firewalling NO NO – Due to other workload commitments
19. IL Israel ISRAGRID ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
20. IT Italy IGI ...
# Short Country NGI 1) Any
IPv6-only site?
2) IPv6 sites
today ?
3) IPv6 sites
planned ?
4) How many sites
with IPv6 connect?
5)NREN IPv6? 6)Motivation
for IPv6
7)Tutorials
IPv6 ?
8)Tutorials IPv6
security ?
9) Testbed? 10) Task
Force?
other info
or comments
21. LV Latvia LatvianGrid ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
22. LT Lithuania LitGRID ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
23. MK FYR Macedonia MARGI ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
24. MD Moldova MD-Grid ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
25. ME Montenegro MREN ...
26. NL The Netherlands BIG Grid ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
27. NO Norway NorGrid ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
28. PL Poland PL-Grid
29. PT Portugal NGI-PT
30. RO Romania RoGrid ...
31. RU Russian Federation <TBA> ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
32. RS Serbia AEGIS ...
33. SK Slovakia SlovakGrid ... ...
34. SI Slovenia SLING ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
35. ES Spain RedIRIS ...
36. SW Sweeden SweGrid ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
37. CH Switzerland SwiNG NO NO NO CSCS-LCG2 could switch IPv6 on if WLCG would ask for it. T3_CH_PSI should get ready by mid-2012 but there's no decision about switching it on yet. YES Motivation is mostly to stay compatible with the current developments, e.g. customers wanting to interact with PSI over IPv6. YES YES YES (Only with very little manpower contribution) NO
38. TR Turkey TR-Grid
39. UK United Kingdom NGS ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
40. EIRO CERN CERN ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
41. EIRO EMBL EMBL ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
42. TW Taiwan ASGC NO YES NO NO YES The collaboration project is ready and
required to support IPv6 services.
YES, at tech.level
On IPv6 deployment, won't help.
YES, at tech.level YES NO