Difference between revisions of "Fedcloud-tf:Blueprint EGI Federated Clouds"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Scenario 2: Running my data and VM in the Infrastructure == | == Scenario 2: Running my data and VM in the Infrastructure == | ||
Leader: Micheal Higgins, CloudSigma | |||
== Scenario 3: Integrating multiple resource providers == | == Scenario 3: Integrating multiple resource providers == |
Revision as of 15:31, 14 October 2011
Introduction
Six scenarios for minimal functionality
Scenario 1: Running a pre-defined VM Image
Leader: Michel Drescher EGI, Matteo Turilli Oxford e-Research Centre
Following need to be considered with this scenario
- Trust level and Auditing of the VM (since it has to run as Root access)
- Different VMs needed based on underlying Infrastructure such as 64 vs 32bits Or VT enabled plus Xen vs KVM
- Contextualization i.e. how users should login to this vm , how his public key transfer and active to login as root to this vm
Scenario 2: Running my data and VM in the Infrastructure
Leader: Micheal Higgins, CloudSigma
Scenario 3: Integrating multiple resource providers
Scenario 4: Accounting across Resource Providers
Scenario 5: Reliability/Availability of Resource Providers
Scenario 6: VM/Resource state change notification
Key Capabilities
VM Management
Data access
Information discovery
Accounting
Monitoring
Notification
References
- http://go.egi.eu/435: Draft of Federated Clouds profile
- http://go.egi.eu/803: Task Force presentations at the EGI Technical Forum 211, Lyon
--Michel 14:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)