Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @

EGI-InSPIRE Task Reviews MS115 MS116

From EGIWiki
Revision as of 14:28, 6 February 2012 by Sergio (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS116 "NGI International Task Review" and for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS115 "EGI Global Tasks Review".
Note: Operations has already been covered by a previous survey.

Assessment by Service

Each NGI should complete its dedicated page following these guidelines:

  • Name: name of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in)
  • Description: description of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in)
  • Assessment: when formulating the text, consider the following questions:
    • for technical services, has this service made progress since the start of the project? did it improve functionally and in its stability? is it used? and if so, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?
    • for human services: have you established working communication links between NGI partners and with how do you evaluate the impact of the activity?
    • for all:
      • is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
      • is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 2 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
  • Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
    • 0 = Not applicable
    • 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
    • 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
    • 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
    • 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
    • 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
  • How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed in order to improve the NGI service during 2012 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if can contribute to improvement of the NGI service

Complete the page for your NGI

  1. Albania
  2. Armenia
  3. Belarus
  4. Belgium
  5. Bosnia and Herzegovina
  6. Bulgaria
  7. Croatia
  8. Cyprus
  9. Czech Republic
  10. Denmark
  11. Finland
  12. France
  13. Georgia
  14. Germany
  15. Greece
  16. Hungary
  17. Ireland
  18. Israel
  19. Italy
  20. Latvia
  21. Lithuania
  22. Macedonia
  23. Moldova
  24. Montenegro
  25. Netherlands
  26. Norway
  27. Poland
  28. Portugal
  29. Romania
  30. Russia
  31. Serbia
  32. Slovakia
  33. Slovenia
  34. Spain
  35. Sweden
  36. Switzerland
  37. Turkey
  38. United Kingdom