Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @

EGI-InSPIRE Task Reviews MS115 MS116

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NGI International Task Review MS116

This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS116 "NGI International Task Review" and for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS115 "EGI Global Tasks Review".

  • Note: Operations has already been covered by a previous survey.

Assessment by Service

Each NGI should complete its dedicated page following these guidelines:

  • Name: name of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in)
  • Description: description of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in)
  • Assessment: when formulating the text, consider the following questions:
    • for technical services, has this service made progress since the start of the project? did it improve functionally and in its stability? is it used? and if so, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?
    • for human services: have you established working communication links between NGI partners and with how do you evaluate the impact of the activity?
    • for all:
      • is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
      • is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 2 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
  • Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
    • 0 = Not applicable
    • 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
    • 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
    • 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
    • 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
    • 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
  • How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed in order to improve the NGI service during 2012 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if can contribute to improvement of the NGI service

Complete the page for your NGI

  1. Albania
  2. Armenia
  3. Belarus
  4. Bulgaria
  5. Bosnia and Herzegovina
  6. Croatia
  7. Cyprus
  8. Czech Republic
  9. Denmark
  10. Finland
  11. France
  12. Georgia
  13. Germany
  14. Greece
  15. Hungary
  16. Ireland
  17. Israel
  18. Italy
  19. Latvia
  20. Lithuania
  21. Macedonia
  22. Moldova
  23. Montenegro
  24. Netherlands
  25. Norway
  26. Poland
  27. Portugal
  28. Romania
  29. Russia
  30. Serbia
  31. Slovakia
  32. Slovenia
  33. Spain
  34. Sweden
  35. Switzerland
  36. Turkey
  37. United Kingdom