Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE Task Reviews MS115 MS116"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== NGI International Task Review MS116 == | == NGI International Task Review MS116 == | ||
This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution | This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution for the [https://documents.egi.eu/document/963 EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS116 "NGI International Task Review"] and for the [https://documents.egi.eu/document/961 EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS115 "EGI Global Tasks Review"]. The operation part was already covered by a previous survey. | ||
=== | === Assessment by Service === | ||
Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines: | Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines: |
Revision as of 12:15, 6 February 2012
NGI International Task Review MS116
This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS116 "NGI International Task Review" and for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS115 "EGI Global Tasks Review". The operation part was already covered by a previous survey.
Assessment by Service
Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines:
- Name: name of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled)
- Description: description of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled)
- Assessment: please answer the following questions:
- for infrastructure/technical services:
- did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?)
- is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?
- for human services:
- did you establish working communication links between NGI partners and with EGI.eu?
- how do you evaluate is the impact of the activity?
- for all:
- is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
- is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
- for infrastructure/technical services:
- Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
- 0 = not applicable
- 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
- 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
- 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
- 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
- 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
- How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the NGI service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service
List of NGIs
- Albania
- Armenia
- Belarus
- Bulgaria
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Macedonia
- Moldova
- Montenegro
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
- Russia
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Turkey
- United Kingdom