Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE Task Reviews MS115 MS116"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '== NGI International Task Review MS116 == This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution that will become part of the…')
 
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== NGI International Task Review MS116  ==
This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution for the [https://documents.egi.eu/document/963 EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS116 "NGI International Task Review"] and for the [https://documents.egi.eu/document/961 EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS115 "EGI Global Tasks Review"].<br>Note: Operations has already been covered by a previous survey.


This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution that will become part of the [[https://documents.egi.eu/document/963 EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS116 "NGI International Task Review"]
== Assessment by Service  ==


=== NGI Assessment by Service  ===
Each NGI should complete its dedicated page following these guidelines:


Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines:
*'''Name''': name of the service as defined in [[EGI-InSPIRE-Tasks|this wiki page]] (''already filled in'')  
 
*'''Description''': description of the service as defined in [[EGI-InSPIRE-Tasks|this wiki page]] (''already filled in'')  
*Name: name of the service as defined in [[EGI-InSPIRE-Tasks | this wiki page]] (''already filled'')  
*'''Assessment''': when formulating the text, consider the following questions:  
*Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'')  
**for technical services, has this service made progress since the start of the project? did it improve functionally and in its stability? is it used? and if so, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?  
*Assessment: please anwer the following questions:  
**for human services: have you established working communication links between NGI partners and with EGI.eu? how do you evaluate the impact of the activity?  
**for infrastructure/technical services:
***did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?)
***is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?  
**for human services:  
***did you establish working communication links between NGI partners and with EGI.eu?  
***how do you evaluate is the impact of the activity?  
**for all:  
**for all:  
***is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?  
***is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?  
***is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)  
***is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 2 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)  
*Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction  
*'''Score''': assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction  
**0 = not applicable  
**0 = Not applicable  
**1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered  
**1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered  
**2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered  
**2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered  
**3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered  
**3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered  
**4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.  
**4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.  
**5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice  
**5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
*How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the NGI service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service
 
*'''How to Improve''': identify which managerial problems should be addressed in order to improve the NGI service during 2012 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service
 
<br>


=== List of NGIs ===
== Complete the page for your NGI ==


#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Albania|Albania]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Albania|Albania]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Armenia|Armenia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Armenia|Armenia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Belarus|Belarus]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Belarus|Belarus]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Bulgaria|Bulgaria]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Belgium|Belgium]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Bosnia and Herzegovina|Bosnia and Herzegovina]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Bosnia and Herzegovina|Bosnia and Herzegovina]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Croatia|Croatia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Bulgaria|Bulgaria]]
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Cyprus|Cyprus]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Croatia|Croatia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Czech Republic|Czech Republic]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Cyprus|Cyprus]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Denmark|Denmark]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Czech Republic|Czech Republic]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Finland|Finland]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Denmark|Denmark]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 France|France]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Finland|Finland]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Georgia|Georgia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 France|France]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Germany|Germany]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Georgia|Georgia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Greece|Greece]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Germany|Germany]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Hungary|Hungary]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Greece|Greece]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Ireland|Ireland]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Hungary|Hungary]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Israel|Israel]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Ireland|Ireland]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Italy|Italy]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Israel|Israel]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Latvia|Latvia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Italy|Italy]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Lithuania|Lithuania ]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Latvia|Latvia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Macedonia|Macedonia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Lithuania|Lithuania ]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Moldova|Moldova]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Macedonia|Macedonia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Montenegro|Montenegro]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Moldova|Moldova]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Netherlands|Netherlands]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Montenegro|Montenegro]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Norway|Norway]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Netherlands|Netherlands]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Poland|Poland]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Norway|Norway]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Portugal|Portugal]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Poland|Poland]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Romania|Romania]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Portugal|Portugal]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Russia|Russia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Romania|Romania]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Serbia|Serbia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Russia|Russia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Slovakia|Slovakia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Serbia|Serbia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Slovenia|Slovenia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Slovakia|Slovakia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Spain|Spain]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Slovenia|Slovenia]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Sweden|Sweden]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Spain|Spain]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Switzerland|Switzerland]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Sweden|Sweden]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 Turkey|Turkey ]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Switzerland|Switzerland]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS109 United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 Turkey|Turkey ]]  
#[[NGI International Task Review MS116 United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]


[[Category:Metrics]]
[[Category:Metrics]]

Latest revision as of 15:28, 6 February 2012

This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS116 "NGI International Task Review" and for the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS115 "EGI Global Tasks Review".
Note: Operations has already been covered by a previous survey.

Assessment by Service

Each NGI should complete its dedicated page following these guidelines:

  • Name: name of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in)
  • Description: description of the service as defined in this wiki page (already filled in)
  • Assessment: when formulating the text, consider the following questions:
    • for technical services, has this service made progress since the start of the project? did it improve functionally and in its stability? is it used? and if so, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?
    • for human services: have you established working communication links between NGI partners and with EGI.eu? how do you evaluate the impact of the activity?
    • for all:
      • is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
      • is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 2 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
  • Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
    • 0 = Not applicable
    • 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
    • 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
    • 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
    • 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
    • 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
  • How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed in order to improve the NGI service during 2012 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service


Complete the page for your NGI

  1. Albania
  2. Armenia
  3. Belarus
  4. Belgium
  5. Bosnia and Herzegovina
  6. Bulgaria
  7. Croatia
  8. Cyprus
  9. Czech Republic
  10. Denmark
  11. Finland
  12. France
  13. Georgia
  14. Germany
  15. Greece
  16. Hungary
  17. Ireland
  18. Israel
  19. Italy
  20. Latvia
  21. Lithuania
  22. Macedonia
  23. Moldova
  24. Montenegro
  25. Netherlands
  26. Norway
  27. Poland
  28. Portugal
  29. Romania
  30. Russia
  31. Serbia
  32. Slovakia
  33. Slovenia
  34. Spain
  35. Sweden
  36. Switzerland
  37. Turkey
  38. United Kingdom
Retrieved from "https://wiki.egi.eu/w/index.php?title=EGI-InSPIRE_Task_Reviews_MS115_MS116&oldid=32348"