Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE:SA1.7-QR7"
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
This quarter we have published a ROD teams newsletter in November, December and January. The rationale behind the newsletter is descibed in the QR4 report. | This quarter we have published a ROD teams newsletter in November, December and January. The rationale behind the newsletter is descibed in the QR4 report. | ||
'''RP OLA and ROD metrics''' | |||
[[SA1.7-QR6]] | |||
For last few months COD team was working within OLA task force to create Resource Provider OLA which will contain obligations between EGI and NGI. This OLA has been approved at the OMB on October 25th 2011. One of the actions was to define ROD metric base on which EGI will check if ROD service is properly delivered by NGIs. During our COD session on Technical Forum in Lyon we presented our proposal for this metric – please read presentation (from page number 9). As a result of the discussion we decided to provide first in a monthly basis simulation of this metric to check what the current status is. We decided to set initially the threshold at the level of 10 items. It means that since October we are going to ask all NGIs above 10 items about the explanation through GGUS, what was the reason of such result and how do you plan to improve the situation. | |||
== TPM == | == TPM == |
Revision as of 19:06, 5 February 2012
1. Task Meetings
2. Main Achievements
Grid Oversight
ROD teams newsletter
This quarter we have published a ROD teams newsletter in November, December and January. The rationale behind the newsletter is descibed in the QR4 report.
RP OLA and ROD metrics
SA1.7-QR6 For last few months COD team was working within OLA task force to create Resource Provider OLA which will contain obligations between EGI and NGI. This OLA has been approved at the OMB on October 25th 2011. One of the actions was to define ROD metric base on which EGI will check if ROD service is properly delivered by NGIs. During our COD session on Technical Forum in Lyon we presented our proposal for this metric – please read presentation (from page number 9). As a result of the discussion we decided to provide first in a monthly basis simulation of this metric to check what the current status is. We decided to set initially the threshold at the level of 10 items. It means that since October we are going to ask all NGIs above 10 items about the explanation through GGUS, what was the reason of such result and how do you plan to improve the situation.
TPM
Network Support
3. Issues and Mitigation
Issue Description | Mitigation Description |
---|---|