Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE:NGI International Task Review MS109"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Information ==
[[Category:Metrics]]
== NGI International Task Review MS109 ==


This page contains the assessment of the NGI International Task at year 1 of the EGI-InSPIRE project (one page oer NGI).
This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution that will become part of the [https://documents.egi.eu/document/315 EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS109 "NGI International Task Review"]


== Table of Content for MS109==
=== NGI Assessment by Service ===


# Introduction
Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines:
# Definitions
## User Services
### Human Services
#### Requirements Gathering
#### Application Database
#### Training
#### Consultancy
## Operations
### Human Services
#### Requirements Gathering
#### Operations Coordination
#### Security
### Infrastructure Services
#### Software Rollout
#### Monitoring
#### Accounting
#### Configuration repository and Operations Portal
#### Helpdesk
#### Core Services
## Other
### Policy Development
### Dissemination
# Analysis
# Conclusions
 
== NGI Assessment by Service ==
 
In the following sub-sections, fill the tables as follows:
* Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'')
* Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'')
* Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'')
* Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (''already filled'')
* Assessment: please anwer the following questions:  
* Assessment: please anwer the following questions:  
** did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?
** for infrastructure/technical services:
** is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expland it?  
*** did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?)
** is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?  
*** is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?
** is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
** for human services:
*** did you establish working communication links between NGI partners and with EGI.eu?
*** how do you evaluate is the impact of the activity?
** for all:
*** is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
*** is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
* Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall  level of satisfaction
* Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall  level of satisfaction
** - = not applicable
** 0 = not applicable
** 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
** 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
** 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
** 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
Line 48: Line 26:
** 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
** 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
** 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
** 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
* How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose
* How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the NGI service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service
 
=== User Services ===
 
==== Human Services ====
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" class="wikitable sortable"
|+ align="bottom" style="color:#e76700;" |NGI Assessment: User Services >> Human Services''
|-
!'''#'''
!'''Name'''
!'''Description'''
!'''Assessment'''
!'''Score'''
!'''How to Improve'''
|-
!2.1.1.1
|Requirements Gathering
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.1.1.2
|Application Database
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.1.1.3
|Training
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.1.1.4
|Consultancy
|
|
|
|
|}
 
=== Operations Services ===
 
==== Human Services ====
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" class="wikitable sortable"
|+ align="bottom" style="color:#e76700;" |NGI Assessment: Operations Services >> Human Services''
|-
!'''#'''
!'''Name'''
!'''Description'''
!'''Assessment'''
!'''Score'''
!'''How to Improve'''
|-
!2.2.1.1
|Requirements Gathering
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.2.1.2
|Operations Coordination
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.2.1.3
|Security
|
|
|
|
|}
 
 
==== Infrastructure Services ====
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" class="wikitable sortable"
|+ align="bottom" style="color:#e76700;" |NGI Assessment: Operations Services >> Infrastructure Services'''
|-
!'''#'''
!'''Name'''
!'''Description'''
!'''Assessment'''
!'''Score'''
!'''How to Improve'''
|-
!2.2.2.1
|Software Rollout
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.2.2.2
|Monitoring
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.2.2.3
|Accounting
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.2.2.4
|Configuration Repository and Operations Portal
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.2.2.5
|Helpdesk
|
|
|
|
|-
!2.2.2.6
|Core Services
|
|
|
|
|}


=== Other ===
=== List of NGIs ===


{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" class="wikitable sortable"
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Albania | Albania]]
|+ align="bottom" style="color:#e76700;" |NGI Assessment: Other''
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Armenia | Armenia]]
! #
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Belarus | Belarus]]
! Name
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Bulgaria | Bulgaria]]
! Description
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina | Bosnia and Herzegovina]]
! Assessment
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Croatia | Croatia]]
! Score
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Cyprus | Cyprus]]
! How to Improve
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Czech_Republic | Czech Republic]]
|-
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Denmark | Denmark]]
!  2.3.1
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Finland | Finland]]
|Policy Development
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_France | France]]
|
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Georgia | Georgia]]
|
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Germany | Germany]]
|
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Greece | Greece]]
|
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Hungary | Hungary]]
|-
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Ireland | Ireland]]
! 2.3.2
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Israel | Israel]]
|Dissemination
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Italy | Italy]]
|
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Latvia | Latvia]]
|
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Lithuania | Lithuania ]]
|
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Macedonia | Macedonia]]
|
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Moldova | Moldova]]
|-
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Montenegro | Montenegro]]
|}
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Netherlands | Netherlands]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Norway | Norway]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Poland | Poland]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Portugal  | Portugal]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Romania | Romania]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Russia | Russia]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Serbia | Serbia]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Slovakia | Slovakia]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Slovenia | Slovenia]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Spain  | Spain]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Sweden | Sweden]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Switzerland | Switzerland]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_Turkey | Turkey ]]
# [[NGI_International_Task_Review_MS109_United_Kingdom | United Kingdom]]

Latest revision as of 19:50, 24 December 2014

NGI International Task Review MS109

This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution that will become part of the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS109 "NGI International Task Review"

NGI Assessment by Service

Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines:

  • Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
  • Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
  • Assessment: please anwer the following questions:
    • for infrastructure/technical services:
      • did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?)
      • is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expand it?
    • for human services:
      • did you establish working communication links between NGI partners and with EGI.eu?
      • how do you evaluate is the impact of the activity?
    • for all:
      • is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
      • is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
  • Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
    • 0 = not applicable
    • 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
    • 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
    • 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
    • 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
    • 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
  • How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the NGI service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose; highlight also if EGI.eu can contribute to improvement of the NGI service

List of NGIs

  1. Albania
  2. Armenia
  3. Belarus
  4. Bulgaria
  5. Bosnia and Herzegovina
  6. Croatia
  7. Cyprus
  8. Czech Republic
  9. Denmark
  10. Finland
  11. France
  12. Georgia
  13. Germany
  14. Greece
  15. Hungary
  16. Ireland
  17. Israel
  18. Italy
  19. Latvia
  20. Lithuania
  21. Macedonia
  22. Moldova
  23. Montenegro
  24. Netherlands
  25. Norway
  26. Poland
  27. Portugal
  28. Romania
  29. Russia
  30. Serbia
  31. Slovakia
  32. Slovenia
  33. Spain
  34. Sweden
  35. Switzerland
  36. Turkey
  37. United Kingdom