Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE:NGI International Task Review MS109"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== NGI International Task Review MS109 ==


== NGI International Task Review MS109 ==
This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution that will become part of the [https://documents.egi.eu/document/315 EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS109 "NGI International Task Review"]


=== NGI Assessment by Service ===
=== NGI Assessment by Service ===

Revision as of 12:00, 28 February 2011

NGI International Task Review MS109

This page contains the links to the individual pages where NGIs are invited to provide their contribution that will become part of the EGI-InSPIRE milestone MS109 "NGI International Task Review"

NGI Assessment by Service

Each NGI should fill its dedicated page following these guidelines:

  • Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
  • Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
  • Assessment: please anwer the following questions:
    • did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?)
    • is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expland it?
    • is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
    • is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
  • Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
    • 0 = not applicable
    • 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
    • 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
    • 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
    • 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
    • 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
  • How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose


List of NGIs

  1. Albania
  2. Armenia
  3. Belarus
  4. Bulgaria
  5. Bosnia and Herzegovina
  6. Croatia
  7. Cyprus
  8. Czech Republic
  9. Denmark
  10. Finland
  11. France
  12. Georgia
  13. Germany
  14. Greece
  15. Hungary
  16. Spain
  17. Portugal
  18. Ireland
  19. Israel
  20. Italy
  21. Latvia
  22. Lithuania
  23. Macedonia
  24. Moldova
  25. Montenegro
  26. Netherlands
  27. Norway
  28. Poland
  29. Romania
  30. Serbia
  31. Slovakia
  32. Slovenia
  33. Sweden
  34. Switzerland
  35. Turkey
  36. United Kingdom