Alert.png The wiki is deprecated and due to be decommissioned by the end of September 2022.
The content is being migrated to other supports, new updates will be ignored and lost.
If needed you can get in touch with EGI SDIS team using operations @ egi.eu.

Difference between revisions of "EGI-InSPIRE:NGI International Task Review MS109"

From EGIWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== NGI International Task Review ==
== Information ==


=== Table of Content for MS109===  
This page contains the assessment of the NGI International Task at year 1 of the EGI-InSPIRE project (one page oer NGI).
 
== Table of Content for MS109==


# Introduction
# Introduction

Revision as of 14:07, 24 February 2011

Information

This page contains the assessment of the NGI International Task at year 1 of the EGI-InSPIRE project (one page oer NGI).

Table of Content for MS109

  1. Introduction
  2. Definitions
    1. User Services
      1. Human Services
        1. Requirements Gathering
        2. Application Database
        3. Training
        4. Consultancy
    2. Operations
      1. Human Services
        1. Requirements Gathering
        2. Operations Coordination
        3. Security
      2. Infrastructure Services
        1. Software Rollout
        2. Monitoring
        3. Accounting
        4. Configuration repository and Operations Portal
        5. Helpdesk
        6. Core Services
    3. Other
      1. Policy Development
      2. Dissemination
  3. Analysis
  4. Conclusions

NGI Assessment by Service

In the following sub-sections, fill the tables as follows:

  • Name: name of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
  • Description: description of the service as defined in D2.7 (already filled)
  • Assessment: please anwer the following questions:
    • did this service make progress since the start of the project (did it improve functionally and in its stability?
    • is it used? if it is, are you planning to consolidate/expland it?
    • is current funding adequate to the amount of effort needed?
    • is this service sustainable? assess from the non-technical viewpoint, what was achieved during year 1 (evaluate funding level vs effort required, sustainability plans for service)
  • Score: assign a score to the service according to your overall level of satisfaction
    • 1 = An unacceptable level of service was delivered
    • 2 = A level of service that was below expectations was delivered
    • 3 = An acceptable service level has been delivered
    • 4 = A level of service that exceeded expectations was delivered, but there is scope for even further improvement.
    • 5 = An excellent service has been delivered that should be considered as best practice
  • How to Improve: identify which managerial problems should be addressed to improve the service during 2011 and the solutions you would like to propose

User Services

Human Services

NGI Assessment: User Services >> Human Services
# Name Description Assessment Score How to Improve
2.1.1.1 Requirements Gathering
2.1.1.2 Application Database
2.1.1.3 Training
2.1.1.4 Consultancy

Operations Services

Human Services

NGI Assessment: Operations Services >> Human Services
# Name Description Assessment Score How to Improve
2.2.1.1 Requirements Gathering
2.2.1.2 Operations Coordination
2.2.1.3 Security


Infrastructure Services

NGI Assessment: Operations Services >> Infrastructure Services
# Name Description Assessment Score How to Improve
2.2.2.1 Software Rollout
2.2.2.2 Monitoring
2.2.2.3 Accounting
2.2.2.4 Configuration Repository and Operations Portal
2.2.2.5 Helpdesk
2.2.2.6 Core Services

Other

NGI Assessment: Other
# Name Description Assessment Score How to Improve
2.3.1 Policy Development
2.3.2 Dissemination