IPv6
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
EGI IPv6 related activities and survey
IPv6 Tools and Links / Guides
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EGEE/IPv6FollowUp EGEE III SA2 IPv6 Follow Up pages
HEPiX IPv6 Working Group
IPv6 Survey
https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/File:IPv6_Questionnaire_for_NGIs-v1.0.pdf
IPv6 Survey Result
# | Short | Country | NGI | 1) Any IPv6-only site? |
2) IPv6 sites today ? |
3) IPv6 sites planned ? |
4) How many sites with IPv6 connect? |
5)NREN IPv6? | 6)Motivation for IPv6 |
7)Tutorials IPv6 ? |
8)Tutorials IPv6 security ? |
9) Testbed? | 10) Task Force? |
other info or comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | AL | Albania | ALBGRID | ... | ... | |||||||||
2. | AM | Armenia | ANGI | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
3. | AT | Austria | AustrianGrid | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
4. | BY | Belarus | BNGI | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
5. | BE | Belgium | BEgrid | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
6. | BA | Bosnia-Herzegovina | NGI_BA | YES | NO | YES, NEXT 6 MONTHS (ROUGHLY) | 2 | YES/NO (2 RENs) | Lack of IPv4 addresses | YES | YES | YES (IN 6 MOTHS TIME) | NO | ... |
7. | BG | Bulgaria | BGI | ... | ... | |||||||||
8. | HR | Croatia | CRO NGI | NO | NO | NO | All | YES | To take advantage of IPv6 protocol specific fetures To promote IPv6 services |
YES | YES | NO | NO | |
9. | CY | Cyprus | CGI | NO | NO | NO | 0 | NO | YES | NO | NO | NO | ... | |
10. | CZ | Czech Republic | MetaCentrum | NO | NO | YES - FZU (Institute of Physics of Academy of Sciences) have a project to try IPv6 for its EGI site, it just started. -CERIT-SC at Masaryk University is interested to provide access to its resources provided the deployed services will become IPv6 ready. |
All | YES | Lack of IPv4 addresses. For providing resources as a virtual clusters (many virtual nodes), but in “classic” deployment too. | Depends on context – not useful without particular deployment plans | Depends on context – not useful without particular deployment plans | YES, FZU site | NO, it can change over time. FZU is involved in the HEPIX IPv6 WG and interested in EGI-wide cooperation. | |
11. | DK | Denmark | <TBA> | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
12. | FI | Finland | CSC/Funet | NO | YES | YES, where available | 1 | YES | Testing and futureproofing | YES | YES | YES | NO | |
13. | FR | France | IDG/FranceGrille | |||||||||||
14. | GE | Georgia | GEO-GRID | NO | NO | NO (Not Yet) | 0 | NO | NO | YES | YES | NO | NO | ... |
15. | DE | Germany | NGI-DE | NO : - currently we no information about a site which will run IPv6 only | YES | 3-10 (1 year) -deploying some services over IPv4/6 dualstack (probably 10 sites within the next year) --running a Grid center over ipv6. (this will be a very small number, may be 3 sites) |
View sites e.g Desy / LMU are running ipv6 (but not necessarily at their Grid (Tier-2) installation ) | 2 with “native” IPv6 : DFN and Belwue | - Connectivity to collaborating sites reachable only via IPv6
- offer services via IPv6 - Our organization decided do deploy IPv6, to be prepared for future. IPv6 definitively will come on the global internet. Step by step KIT will rollout IPv6 on all available services. |
YES, but Grid site and Middelware specific, since there are already lots of training and tutorials available (from NRENs, Geant/Dante, Ripe,… and commercial companies) | YES, but Grid site and Middelware specific, since there are already lots of training and tutorials available (from NRENs, Geant/Dante, Ripe,… and commercial companies) | YES | NO - KIT is involved in HEPIX IPv6 WG
- and we would be a Grid middleware test side - everything beyond would be over our capacity we are able to provide |
|
16. | GR | Greece | GRNET/Hellasgrid | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | NO | NO | YES | NO | ||
17. | HU | Hungary | MGKK | ... | ||||||||||
18. | IE | Ireland | GridIreland | NO | YES - Not a Grid Site level, but at Institute level. 5 of our 6 grid connected sites support IPv6 | NO | 5 | YES | Technological advantages | YES | YES – In particular Ipv6 firewalling | NO | NO – Due to other workload commitments | |
19. | IL | Israel | ISRAGRID | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
20. | IT | Italy | IGI | NO | YES | NO | All | YES | Experiment m/w using IPv6 | YES | YES | YES | YES | ... |
# | Short | Country | NGI | 1) Any IPv6-only site? |
2) IPv6 sites today ? |
3) IPv6 sites planned ? |
4) How many sites with IPv6 connect? |
5)NREN IPv6? | 6)Motivation for IPv6 |
7)Tutorials IPv6 ? |
8)Tutorials IPv6 security ? |
9) Testbed? | 10) Task Force? |
other info or comments |
21. | LV | Latvia | LatvianGrid | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
22. | LT | Lithuania | LitGRID | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
23. | MK | FYR Macedonia | MARGI | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
24. | MD | Moldova | MD-Grid | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
25. | ME | Montenegro | MREN | ... | ||||||||||
26. | NL | The Netherlands | BIG Grid | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
27. | NO | Norway | NorGrid | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
28. | PL | Poland | PL-Grid | |||||||||||
29. | PT | Portugal | NGI-PT | |||||||||||
30. | RO | Romania | RoGrid | ... | ||||||||||
31. | RU | Russian Federation | <TBA> | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
32. | RS | Serbia | AEGIS | ... | ||||||||||
33. | SK | Slovakia | SlovakGrid | ... | ... | |||||||||
34. | SI | Slovenia | SLING | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
35. | ES | Spain | RedIRIS | ... | ||||||||||
36. | SW | Sweeden | SweGrid | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
37. | CH | Switzerland | SwiNG | NO | NO | NO | CSCS-LCG2 could switch IPv6 on if WLCG would ask for it. T3_CH_PSI should get ready by mid-2012 but there's no decision about switching it on yet. | YES | Motivation is mostly to stay compatible with the current developments, e.g. customers wanting to interact with PSI over IPv6. | YES | YES | YES (Only with very little manpower contribution) | NO | |
38. | TR | Turkey | TR-Grid | |||||||||||
39. | UK | United Kingdom | NGS | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
40. | EIRO | CERN | CERN | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
41. | EIRO | EMBL | EMBL | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | |
42. | TW | Taiwan | ASGC | NO | YES | NO | NO | YES | The collaboration project is ready and required to support IPv6 services. |
YES, at tech.level On IPv6 deployment, won't help. |
YES, at tech.level | YES | NO |