Difference between revisions of "Network Support Task force"
Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
|''' A:''' If the network problem will occur within the French NGI,<br> French sites will contact the appropriate network provider.<br> If the problem is a remote problem ( a French site cannot join a foreign site ), | |''' A:''' If the network problem will occur within the French NGI,<br> French sites will contact the appropriate network provider.<br> If the problem is a remote problem ( a French site cannot join a foreign site ), we will check with Down Collector tool ;<br> then if the status of the foreign site is still ‘unreachable’,<br> it will be useful to escalate the problem either<br> toward EGI network support team<br> or towards the contact person for the network<br> support of the remote NGI | ||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
! 14. | ! 14. |
Revision as of 14:50, 16 November 2010
Network Support Team
Contacts and other relevant information
Mailing List (ML): network.support@mailman.egi.eu - (29 NGIs/EIROs provided contacts out of 41 total [70%] - 12 still missing as of Nov 8,2010 )
Questionnaire on Network Support Use Cases
https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/6/62/Answers-Explained.pdf - (Higher numbers mean high involvement offered/requested [task considered useful] )
# | Short | Country | NGI | in ML? | NGI= NREN? |
Answ. Quest? |
GGUS (A) |
PERT (B) |
Sched Maint (C) |
Troub OnDem (D) |
e2e MultiD Monit (E) |
Down Coll (F) |
Policy Collab (G) |
other info or comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | AL | Albania | ALBGRID | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
2. | AM | Armenia | ANGI | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
3. | AT | Austria | AustrianGrid | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
4. | BY | Belarus | BNGI | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
5. | BE | Belgium | BEgrid | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
6. | BA | Bosnia-Herzegovina | NGI_BA | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
7. | BG | Bulgaria | BGI | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
8. | HR | Croatia | CRO NGI | yes | no | yes | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | B: a) EGI PERT will confuse users (and community) as it would be very hard to distinguish ‘network(data transfer issues) performance’ from e.g. ‘computing performance’; perhaps EGI netPERT b) In a specific situation of course that ‘not only a dispatcher role (Answer 3)’ we see this service as a useful service in community C:We have a ‘schedule maintenance’ notification procedure |
9. | CY | Cyprus | CGI | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
10. | CZ | Czech Republic | MetaCentrum | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
11. | DK | Denmark | <TBA> | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
12. | FI | Finland | CSC/Funet | yes | yes | yes | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | B: In establishing this function, one important starting point is coordination with existing activities within NRENs and DANTE/GÉANT. C:ideally, both push and pull functionalities |
13. | FR | France | IDG/CNRS | yes | no | yes | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | A: If the network problem will occur within the French NGI, French sites will contact the appropriate network provider. If the problem is a remote problem ( a French site cannot join a foreign site ), we will check with Down Collector tool ; then if the status of the foreign site is still ‘unreachable’, it will be useful to escalate the problem either toward EGI network support team or towards the contact person for the network support of the remote NGI |
14. | GE | Georgia | GEO-GRID | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
15. | DE | Germany | NGI-DE | yes | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
16. | GR | Greece | Hellasgrid | yes | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
17. | HU | Hungary | MGKK | yes | ... | yes | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ... |
18. | IE | Ireland | GridIreland | yes | ... | yes | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | C: Not every site is of interest to the VOs. Most VOs and Users are only interested in knowing about the availability of the services that directly affect them ( WMS,LB, MyProxy, Top-BDII etc). F: Multiple down collectors could be used, |
19. | IL | Israel | ISRAGRID | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
20. | IT | Italy | IGI | yes | no | yes | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | ... |
21. | LV | Latvia | LatvianGrid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
22. | LT | Lithuania | LitGRID | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
23. | MK | FYR Macedonia | MARGI | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
24. | MD | Moldova | MD-Grid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
25. | ME | Montenegro | MREN | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
26. | NL | The Netherlands | BIG Grid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
27. | NO | Norway | NorGrid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
28. | PL | Poland | PL-Grid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
29. | PT | Portugal | NGI-PT | yes | no | yes | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | B: Yes, but working as an advice group since the capacity to act at the site level is low D: The monitoring system is valuable. |
30. | RO | Romania | RoGrid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
31. | RU | Russian Federation | <TBA> | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
32. | RS | Serbia | AEGIS | yes | yes | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ... | |
33. | SK | Slovakia | SlovakGrid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
34. | SI | Slovenia | SLING | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
35. | ES | Spain | RedIRIS | yes | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
36. | SW | Sweeden | SweGrid | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
37. | CH | Switzerland | SwiNG | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
38. | TR | Turkey | TR-Grid | yes | yes | yes | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | A: TUBITAK ULAKBIM (NGI_TR coordinator) is also managing NREN. Manpower will be given on a best effort basis. |
39. | UK | United Kingdom | NGS | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
40. | EIRO | CERN | CERN | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
41. | EIRO | EMBL | EMBL | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Network Monitoring Proposal Task Force
egi-network-monitoring-proposal-task-force@googlegroups.com
- Etienne Duble France-Grille (UREC CNRS)
Presentations on Network Monitoring and Support for EGI
Task Coordination
- Presentation at the EGI TF 15 Sept 2010 Amsterdam
Documents
- Questionnaire sent to the NGIs about Network Support use casesTools Wiki Page
https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/Network