Difference between revisions of "Network Support Task force"
m (moved Network Support to Network Support Task force) |
|||
(86 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{EGI_Activity_groups_menubar}} | |||
{{Template:Deprecated}} | |||
{{TOC_right}} | |||
[[Category:Special Interest groups]] | |||
= Contacts and meetings = | |||
* '''Contact''': network.support AT mailman.egi.eu | |||
Note: '''33''' NGIs/EIROs provided contacts out of '''41''' total ['''80%'''] - '''8 still missing''' as of Nov 20,2010 | |||
* '''Network Support Coordination VideoConferences and F2F Meetings''' [https://www.egi.eu/indico/categoryDisplay.py?categId=58 agendas] | |||
* '''Network Support Task Force (Oct 2010 - Jan 2011)''' [https://www.egi.eu/indico/categoryDisplay.py?categId=42 agendas] | |||
* Network support workshop, Amsterdam, 24 Jan 2011: [https://www.egi.eu/indico/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=153 agenda] | |||
* '''VOMS-1for the EGI Network Support VO''' (courtesy of FZU) : https://voms.ipv6.farm.particle.cz:8443/voms/net.egi.eu/ | |||
* '''VOMS-2 for the EGI Network Support VO''' (courtesy of INFN CNAF) : https://vomsmania.cnaf.infn.it:8443/voms/net.egi.eu/ | |||
== | = Questionnaire on Network Support Use Cases = | ||
https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/6/62/Answers-Explained.pdf - (Higher numbers mean high involvement offered/requested [task considered useful] )<BR> | |||
https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/5/59/Questionnaire-NGIs-ANSWERS.xls : '''Excel file summarizing the results so far''' (as of Nov 25, 24 NGIs answered) <br> | |||
https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/6/62/Answers-Explained.pdf - (Higher numbers mean high involvement offered/requested [task considered useful] ) | |||
{| style="background:#cccc99;color:black;width:80%;" border="1";cellpadding="5";cellspacing="0";align="center" | {| style="background:#cccc99;color:black;width:80%;" border="1";cellpadding="5";cellspacing="0";align="center" | ||
! # !!Short!! Country !! NGI !! in ML? !! NGI=<br>NREN? !! Answ.<br>Quest? !! GGUS<br>(A)!! PERT<br>(B) !! Sched<br> Maint<br>(C) !! Troub<br> OnDem<br>(D) !! | ! # !!Short!! Country !! NGI !! in ML? !! NGI=<br>NREN? !! Answ.<br>Quest? !! GGUS<br>(A)!! PERT<br>(B) !! Sched<br> Maint<br>(C) !! Troub<br> OnDem<br>(D) !! e2eMultiD <br> Monit<br>(E) !! Down<br> Coll<br>(F)!! Policy <br> Collab <br>(G) !! other info<br>or comments | ||
|- style="background:white; color:black" | |- style="background:white; color:black" | ||
! 1. | ! 1. | ||
Line 21: | Line 30: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
|... | |... | ||
| | |yes | ||
| | |4 | ||
| | |4 | ||
| | |4 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:#aaf0f0; color:red" | |- style="background:#aaf0f0; color:red" | ||
Line 46: | Line 55: | ||
|... | |... | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:# | |- style="background:#ddaa44; color:red" | ||
! 3. | ! 3. | ||
| AT | | AT | ||
| Austria | | ''Austria'' | ||
| AustrianGrid | | AustrianGrid | ||
| '''no''' | | '''no''' | ||
Line 94: | Line 103: | ||
|... | |... | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:# | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
! 6. | ! 6. | ||
| BA | | BA | ||
| Bosnia-Herzegovina | | Bosnia-Herzegovina | ||
| NGI_BA | | NGI_BA | ||
| | | yes | ||
|... | |... | ||
| yes | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 2 | |||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background: | |- style="background:white; color:black" | ||
! 7. | ! 7. | ||
| BG | | BG | ||
| Bulgaria | | Bulgaria | ||
| BGI | | BGI | ||
| | |yes | ||
|... | |... | ||
|yes | |||
|3 | |||
|2 | |||
|3 | |||
|3 | |||
|3 | |||
|3 | |||
|3 | |||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
Line 142: | Line 151: | ||
| 3 | | 3 | ||
| 2 | | 2 | ||
|''' B:<br> | |''' B:<br> 1)''' EGI PERT will confuse users (and community) as it would be<br> very hard to distinguish ‘network(data transfer issues)<br> performance’ from e.g. ‘computing performance’; perhaps EGI netPERT<br> | ||
''' | '''2)''' In a specific situation of course that<br> Network AND Grid/Middleware know is needed / welcomed.<br> | ||
''' | '''3)''' With further / more clear elaboration and<br> ‘not only a dispatcher role (Answer 3)’ <br>we see this service as a useful service in community<br><hr> | ||
'''C:'''We have a ‘schedule maintenance’ notification procedure<br> in operation (agreed by Croatian NREN - CARNet), <br>and it looks useful | '''C:'''We have a ‘schedule maintenance’ notification procedure<br> in operation (agreed by Croatian NREN - CARNet), <br>and it looks useful | ||
for grid community in Croatia.<br> In our opinion, similar NGI-NREN collaboration<br> is needed in every EU/World country.<br> | for grid community in Croatia.<br> In our opinion, similar NGI-NREN collaboration<br> is needed in every EU/World country.<br> | ||
Line 153: | Line 162: | ||
| CGI | | CGI | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| | |yes | ||
| | |yes | ||
| | |4 | ||
| | |4 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
Line 169: | Line 178: | ||
| MetaCentrum | | MetaCentrum | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 5 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | | ||
|- style="background:#ddaa44; color:red" | |- style="background:#ddaa44; color:red" | ||
Line 222: | Line 231: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| no | | no | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | | 1 | ||
| | | 5 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 6 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
|... | |''' A:''' If the network problem will occur within the French NGI,<br> French sites will contact the appropriate network provider.<br> If the problem is a remote problem ( a French site cannot join a foreign site ), we will check with Down Collector tool ;<br> then if the status of the foreign site is still ‘unreachable’,<br> it will be useful to escalate the problem either<br> toward EGI network support team<br> or towards the contact person for the network<br> support of the remote NGI<br> | ||
'''C:''' We prefer “the pull approach” in a first step,<br> however we think that would be very useful but difficult<br> to achieve from our experience of EGEE SA2.<br> | |||
'''F:''' One should check if Nagios Box do not provide<br> already the same feature.<br> | |||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
! 14. | ! 14. | ||
Line 237: | Line 248: | ||
| GEO-GRID | | GEO-GRID | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| | |yes | ||
| | |yes | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |4 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |2 | ||
| | |2 | ||
|... | |... | ||
Line 255: | Line 266: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| no | | no | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |2 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |2 | ||
| | |'''B:''' The Grid/Middleware knowledge is present at each attached site<br> | ||
'''D:''' constant service monitoring --> like developed at Dante MDM-system<br> | |||
'''E:''' Re use/invent of MDM/Hades Monitoring system<br> | |||
'''F:''' LHC-SAM could be copied<br> | |||
'''G:''' maybe a corresponding group to OSCT could cover this task<br> | |||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
! 16. | ! 16. | ||
Line 271: | Line 286: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | |2 | ||
| | |2 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |2 | ||
| | |2 | ||
|... | |... | ||
Line 347: | Line 362: | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:#cccc99;color:black;width:80%;" border="1";cellpadding="5";cellspacing="0";align="center" | |||
! # !!Short!! Country !! NGI !! in ML? !! NGI=<br>NREN? !! Answ.<br>Quest? !! GGUS<br>(A)!! PERT<br>(B) !! Sched<br> Maint<br>(C) !! Troub<br> OnDem<br>(D) !! e2eMultiD <br> Monit<br>(E) !! Down<br> Coll<br>(F)!! Policy <br> Collab <br>(G) !! other info<br>or comments | |||
|- style="background:white; color:black" | |- style="background:white; color:black" | ||
! 21. | ! 21. | ||
Line 413: | Line 429: | ||
|... | |... | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background: | |- style="background:white; color:black" | ||
! 25. | ! 25. | ||
| ME | | ME | ||
| Montenegro | | Montenegro | ||
| MREN | | MREN | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 2 | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
Line 468: | Line 484: | ||
| PL-Grid | | PL-Grid | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| | | no | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 5 | ||
|... | | 4 | ||
| 2 | |||
| '''D'''. '''E'''. and '''F'''. could be combined in a common tool or group of tools and its development should be synchronized.<BR><hr> | |||
Contribution to '''E'''. and '''F'''. needs to be confirmed when expected resources and effort will be known.<BR><hr> | |||
'''G'''. We do not see a strong need for such a group, especially not merged with PERT. But if a group will be setup we can consider a way of participation. | |||
|- style="background:white; color:black" | |- style="background:white; color:black" | ||
! 29. | ! 29. | ||
Line 495: | Line 512: | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
|'''B:''' Yes, but working as an advice group since<br> the capacity to act at the site level is low<br> | |'''B:''' Yes, but working as an advice group since<br> the capacity to act at the site level is low<br> | ||
'''D:''' The monitoring system is valuable.<br> An infrastructure for on demand testing <br>and monitoring should be created. <br>'''E:''' | '''D:''' The monitoring system is valuable.<br> An infrastructure for on demand testing <br>and monitoring should be created. <br>'''E:''' Option D already seems sufficient.<br>'''F:''' Option D (on demand monitoring) <br>should cover these needs.<br> | ||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
! 30. | ! 30. | ||
Line 502: | Line 519: | ||
| RoGrid | | RoGrid | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| | | no | ||
| | |yes | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
|... | |... | ||
Line 553: | Line 570: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
|... | |... | ||
| | |yes | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 4 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 3 | ||
| | | 5 | ||
| | | 2 | ||
| | | 2 | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
Line 586: | Line 603: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| | | yes | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |4 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |6 | ||
| | |2 | ||
| | |6 | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:#aaf0f0; color:red" | |- style="background:#aaf0f0; color:red" | ||
Line 618: | Line 635: | ||
| SwiNG | | SwiNG | ||
|yes | |yes | ||
| | |no | ||
| | |yes | ||
| | |5 | ||
| | |4 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |3 | ||
| | |5 | ||
| | |3 | ||
|... | |5 | ||
|'''A:'''There’s a single person to contact:<br> A. Aeschlimann, no replacement. <br>There’s very few available time resources. <br> | |||
'''E:''' There’s very few available time resources.<br> | |||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | ||
! 38. | ! 38. | ||
Line 692: | Line 710: | ||
|... | |... | ||
|... | |... | ||
|- style="background:#f0f0f0; color:black" | |||
! 42. | |||
| TW | |||
| Taiwan | |||
| ASGC | |||
| ... | |||
| | |||
| yes | |||
| 4 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| '''A:''' The up today status report of the ticket is valuable<BR>to users to arrange their work in a more<BR> efficient way. ASGC definitely would provide first<BR> level network monitoring support to Asia partners.<BR> But, currently the manpower resource is still<BR> not enough to service entire NGI project partners.<BR> | |||
'''B:''' Yes, it is good to have such kind of support team.<BR> But, the team seems not easy to be<BR> formed and maintained.<BR> | |||
'''G:''' I’m worried that this would be too difficult to achieve.<BR> | |||
|} | |} | ||
== ''' | = Task Force Members = | ||
'''Contacts''': egi-network-monitoring-proposal-task-force at googlegroups.com | |||
* Etienne Duble France-Grille (UREC CNRS) <dt> | |||
< | * Xavier Jeannin France-Grille (UREC CNRS) <dt> | ||
< | * Esther Robles (RedIRIS) <dt> | ||
* Alberto Escolano (RedIRIS) <dt> | |||
* Bruno Hoeft (D-GRID KIT) <dt> | |||
* Mario Reale (IGI GARR) <dt> | |||
* Fulvio Galeazzi (IGI GARR) <dt> | |||
* Alfredo Pagano (IGI GARR) <dt> | |||
* Wenshui Chen (ASGC) <dt> | |||
* Domenico Vicinanza (DANTE Int.Rel.Team) <dt> | |||
* Szymon Trocha (PSNC/GN3 SA2 T3 PerfSONAR) <dt> | |||
= '''Presentations on Network Monitoring and Support for EGI and Other relevant documents ''' = | |||
'''Task Coordination''' | '''Task Coordination''' | ||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/File:EGI-NETWORK-SUPPORT-EGI-TASK-OMB.pdf Presentation at the EGI TF 15 Sept 2010 Amsterdam ] <dt> | |||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/File:Amsterdam-SA1-Kick-Off-June-3-2010-MReale-O-E-12.pdf EGI SA1 Kick Off 3 June 2010 Amsterdam ] <dt> | |||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/File:Transition-OTAG-GARR-MReale-v0.0.pdf OTAG Meeting 3 March 2010 Amsterdam ] <dt> | |||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/File:Transition-GARR-MReale-v1.0.pdf EGEE III to EGI Transition Meeting 2 March 2010 Amsterdam ] <dt> | |||
'''Tools''' | '''Tools''' | ||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/wiki/File:HINTS_4.pdf Talk on HINTS at NRENs&GRIDs Amsterdam 15 Sept 2010 by Xavier Jeannin and Etienne Duble ] <dt> | |||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/9/90/ST-GN3-20100915-perfSONAR_at_EGI_Technical_Forum-3.pdf Talk on PerfSONAR at NRENs&GRIDs Amsterdam 15 Sept 2010 by Szymon Trocha ]<dt> | |||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/3/32/NetJobs-0.4.pdf Talk on NetJobs at NRENs&GRIDs Amsterdam 15 Sept 2010 by Etienne Duble and Alfredo Pagano ] <dt> | |||
'''Presentations at the F2F Network Monitoring OMB, January 24, 2011 - Amsterdam, EGI.eu ''' | |||
== | = Tools= | ||
* Network monitoring and troubleshooting [[Network |Tools]] (also reachable through the alias http://net.egi.eu) | |||
=Documents= | |||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/7/7c/Questionnaire-NGIs-New.pdf Questionnaire sent to the NGIs about Network Support use cases ]<dt> | |||
= | = Minutes Meetings and VCONFERENCES= | ||
* [https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/6/6b/EGI_Network_Support_coordination-2011-4-7.doc Minutes VCONF NetSup update April 7 2011] <dt> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:55, 19 June 2015
EGI Activity groups | Special Interest groups | Policy groups | Virtual teams | Distributed Competence Centres |
This article is Deprecated and should no longer be used, but is still available for reasons of reference. |
Contacts and meetings
- Contact: network.support AT mailman.egi.eu
Note: 33 NGIs/EIROs provided contacts out of 41 total [80%] - 8 still missing as of Nov 20,2010
- Network Support Coordination VideoConferences and F2F Meetings agendas
- Network Support Task Force (Oct 2010 - Jan 2011) agendas
- Network support workshop, Amsterdam, 24 Jan 2011: agenda
- VOMS-1for the EGI Network Support VO (courtesy of FZU) : https://voms.ipv6.farm.particle.cz:8443/voms/net.egi.eu/
- VOMS-2 for the EGI Network Support VO (courtesy of INFN CNAF) : https://vomsmania.cnaf.infn.it:8443/voms/net.egi.eu/
Questionnaire on Network Support Use Cases
https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/6/62/Answers-Explained.pdf - (Higher numbers mean high involvement offered/requested [task considered useful] )
https://wiki.egi.eu/w/images/5/59/Questionnaire-NGIs-ANSWERS.xls : Excel file summarizing the results so far (as of Nov 25, 24 NGIs answered)
# | Short | Country | NGI | in ML? | NGI= NREN? |
Answ. Quest? |
GGUS (A) |
PERT (B) |
Sched Maint (C) |
Troub OnDem (D) |
e2eMultiD Monit (E) |
Down Coll (F) |
Policy Collab (G) |
other info or comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | AL | Albania | ALBGRID | yes | ... | yes | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ... |
2. | AM | Armenia | ANGI | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
3. | AT | Austria | AustrianGrid | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
4. | BY | Belarus | BNGI | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
5. | BE | Belgium | BEgrid | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
6. | BA | Bosnia-Herzegovina | NGI_BA | yes | ... | yes | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ... |
7. | BG | Bulgaria | BGI | yes | ... | yes | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ... |
8. | HR | Croatia | CRO NGI | yes | no | yes | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | B: 1) EGI PERT will confuse users (and community) as it would be very hard to distinguish ‘network(data transfer issues) performance’ from e.g. ‘computing performance’; perhaps EGI netPERT 2) In a specific situation of course that ‘not only a dispatcher role (Answer 3)’ we see this service as a useful service in community C:We have a ‘schedule maintenance’ notification procedure |
9. | CY | Cyprus | CGI | yes | yes | yes | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ... |
10. | CZ | Czech Republic | MetaCentrum | yes | yes | yes | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | |
11. | DK | Denmark | <TBA> | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
12. | FI | Finland | CSC/Funet | yes | yes | yes | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | B: In establishing this function, one important starting point is coordination with existing activities within NRENs and DANTE/GÉANT. C:ideally, both push and pull functionalities |
13. | FR | France | IDG/CNRS | yes | no | yes | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | A: If the network problem will occur within the French NGI, French sites will contact the appropriate network provider. If the problem is a remote problem ( a French site cannot join a foreign site ), we will check with Down Collector tool ; then if the status of the foreign site is still ‘unreachable’, it will be useful to escalate the problem either toward EGI network support team or towards the contact person for the network support of the remote NGI C: We prefer “the pull approach” in a first step, |
14. | GE | Georgia | GEO-GRID | yes | yes | yes | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ... |
15. | DE | Germany | NGI-DE | yes | no | yes | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | B: The Grid/Middleware knowledge is present at each attached site D: constant service monitoring --> like developed at Dante MDM-system |
16. | GR | Greece | Hellasgrid | yes | yes | yes | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ... |
17. | HU | Hungary | MGKK | yes | ... | yes | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ... |
18. | IE | Ireland | GridIreland | yes | ... | yes | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | C: Not every site is of interest to the VOs. Most VOs and Users are only interested in knowing about the availability of the services that directly affect them ( WMS,LB, MyProxy, Top-BDII etc). F: Multiple down collectors could be used, |
19. | IL | Israel | ISRAGRID | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
20. | IT | Italy | IGI | yes | no | yes | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | ... |
# | Short | Country | NGI | in ML? | NGI= NREN? |
Answ. Quest? |
GGUS (A) |
PERT (B) |
Sched Maint (C) |
Troub OnDem (D) |
e2eMultiD Monit (E) |
Down Coll (F) |
Policy Collab (G) |
other info or comments |
21. | LV | Latvia | LatvianGrid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
22. | LT | Lithuania | LitGRID | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
23. | MK | FYR Macedonia | MARGI | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
24. | MD | Moldova | MD-Grid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
25. | ME | Montenegro | MREN | yes | yes | yes | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | ... |
26. | NL | The Netherlands | BIG Grid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
27. | NO | Norway | NorGrid | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
28. | PL | Poland | PL-Grid | yes | no | yes | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | D. E. and F. could be combined in a common tool or group of tools and its development should be synchronized. Contribution to E. and F. needs to be confirmed when expected resources and effort will be known. G. We do not see a strong need for such a group, especially not merged with PERT. But if a group will be setup we can consider a way of participation. |
29. | PT | Portugal | NGI-PT | yes | no | yes | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | B: Yes, but working as an advice group since the capacity to act at the site level is low D: The monitoring system is valuable. |
30. | RO | Romania | RoGrid | yes | no | yes | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ... |
31. | RU | Russian Federation | <TBA> | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
32. | RS | Serbia | AEGIS | yes | yes | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | ... | |
33. | SK | Slovakia | SlovakGrid | yes | ... | yes | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | ... |
34. | SI | Slovenia | SLING | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
35. | ES | Spain | RedIRIS | yes | yes | yes | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 6 | ... |
36. | SW | Sweeden | SweGrid | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
37. | CH | Switzerland | SwiNG | yes | no | yes | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | A:There’s a single person to contact: A. Aeschlimann, no replacement. There’s very few available time resources. E: There’s very few available time resources. |
38. | TR | Turkey | TR-Grid | yes | yes | yes | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | A: TUBITAK ULAKBIM (NGI_TR coordinator) is also managing NREN. Manpower will be given on a best effort basis. |
39. | UK | United Kingdom | NGS | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
40. | EIRO | CERN | CERN | yes | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
41. | EIRO | EMBL | EMBL | no | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
42. | TW | Taiwan | ASGC | ... | yes | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | A: The up today status report of the ticket is valuable to users to arrange their work in a more efficient way. ASGC definitely would provide first level network monitoring support to Asia partners. But, currently the manpower resource is still not enough to service entire NGI project partners. B: Yes, it is good to have such kind of support team. |
Task Force Members
Contacts: egi-network-monitoring-proposal-task-force at googlegroups.com
- Etienne Duble France-Grille (UREC CNRS)
- Xavier Jeannin France-Grille (UREC CNRS)
- Esther Robles (RedIRIS)
- Alberto Escolano (RedIRIS)
- Bruno Hoeft (D-GRID KIT)
- Mario Reale (IGI GARR)
- Fulvio Galeazzi (IGI GARR)
- Alfredo Pagano (IGI GARR)
- Wenshui Chen (ASGC)
- Domenico Vicinanza (DANTE Int.Rel.Team)
- Szymon Trocha (PSNC/GN3 SA2 T3 PerfSONAR)
Presentations on Network Monitoring and Support for EGI and Other relevant documents
Task Coordination
- Presentation at the EGI TF 15 Sept 2010 Amsterdam
- EGI SA1 Kick Off 3 June 2010 Amsterdam
- OTAG Meeting 3 March 2010 Amsterdam
- EGEE III to EGI Transition Meeting 2 March 2010 Amsterdam
Tools
- Talk on HINTS at NRENs&GRIDs Amsterdam 15 Sept 2010 by Xavier Jeannin and Etienne Duble
- Talk on PerfSONAR at NRENs&GRIDs Amsterdam 15 Sept 2010 by Szymon Trocha
- Talk on NetJobs at NRENs&GRIDs Amsterdam 15 Sept 2010 by Etienne Duble and Alfredo Pagano
Presentations at the F2F Network Monitoring OMB, January 24, 2011 - Amsterdam, EGI.eu
Tools
- Network monitoring and troubleshooting Tools (also reachable through the alias http://net.egi.eu)